<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/3/2021 6:47 μ.μ., Ryan Sleevi
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CACvaWvbFMm8hw6HhY57+7bLKU_baTp4qv4u3VH77=vZc8uTGXQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">Dimitris,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Given the length of discussion here, are you aware of
systems not yet conforming? Perhaps you can speak about what
concrete (rather than abstract) difficulties there would be?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>That's not to say an effective date is a forgone
conclusion, but I think as a Forum, we're much more productive
when members with concrete concerns bring them forward, rather
than abstracts "on behalf of someone else". For example, what
challenges might HARICA face? Understanding that would help
both make better ballots, and perhaps highlight industry good
practices from other CAs that HARICA could adopt so that these
aren't concerns in the future.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
CAs need to update their validation code to allow ONLY these
specific HTTP responses for redirects. This also needs to be applied
consistently, including ACME implementations that may not currently
support this configuration option. For example, I believe EJBCA does
not have this option for their ACME server engine component.<br>
<br>
For HARICA, it's easy to update the main RA code but we currently
rely on EJBCA for ACME and that might cause some delays.<br>
<br>
I hope this helps.<br>
<br>
<br>
Dimitris.<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CACvaWvbFMm8hw6HhY57+7bLKU_baTp4qv4u3VH77=vZc8uTGXQ@mail.gmail.com"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:59
AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Servercert-wg <<a
href="mailto:servercert-wg@cabforum.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">servercert-wg@cabforum.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div> <span style="font-family:sans-serif">Shouldn't there be
an effective date in this ballot so that CAs have time to
update their various systems to support these updated
requirements?</span> <br>
<br>
<span style="font-family:sans-serif">Software vendors might
also need time to update and test their software before
releasing a newer version, which then needs to be properly
tested and installed by CAs.</span> <br>
<br>
<span style="font-family:sans-serif">Thanks,</span> <br>
<br>
<br>
<span style="font-family:sans-serif">Dimitris.</span> <br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Servercert-wg mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Servercert-wg@cabforum.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">Servercert-wg@cabforum.org</a><br>
<a
href="https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>