<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 16/5/2024 3:17 μ.μ., Arno Fiedler
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:GVXP192MB1710390FA979012DA9769E0295ED2@GVXP192MB1710.EURP192.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<meta name="Generator"
content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style>@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}span.E-MailFormatvorlage18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}</style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">Hello Dimitris,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">the GLEIF has developed the concept of a
“Verifiable Legal Identifier”, the qvLEI are issued by a
trusted network of “qualified” vLEI Issuers.<br>
That seems to be an interesting and important new topic in
the field of organizational identities/OV based on LEI<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">We can ask the GLEIF CEO Stepan Worl for a
lecture, let me know if I should ask him (like in 2017)</span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
There is a new CEO taking over June 26, 2024. For me this sounds
very interesting and I've been following this work for a while. I
assume you are suggesting that we have a guest speaker on this topic
in a future F2F meeting, not the one in Bergamo which is just around
the corner.<br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Dimitris.<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:GVXP192MB1710390FA979012DA9769E0295ED2@GVXP192MB1710.EURP192.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">Best regards<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">Arno<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div
style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Von:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">
Public <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org"><public-bounces@cabforum.org></a>
<b>Im Auftrag von </b>Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)
via Public<br>
<b>Gesendet:</b> Dienstag, 14. Mai 2024 17:28<br>
<b>An:</b> Ben Wilson <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:bwilson@mozilla.com"><bwilson@mozilla.com></a><br>
<b>Cc:</b> CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:public@cabforum.org"><public@cabforum.org></a><br>
<b>Betreff:</b> Re: [cabfpub] Bergamo F2F Agenda Item<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 14/5/2024 6:08 μ.μ., Ben Wilson wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Dimitris, <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">There appears to be an open slot on
the F2F agenda - Wed. May 29th at 9:05 a.m. I was
thinking we could use that time to discuss revocation
timelines and balancing the security provided by
revocation with the security/stability needed to support
critical infrastructure. In other words, we could
discuss BR section 4.9.1 and concerns about disruption
of global/national operations in banking/finance,
transportation, government, telecommunications,
healthcare, and other key areas where certificate
revocation might cause key systems to fail.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Should I put this topic in that open
slot on the wiki?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Ben<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
Hi Ben,<br>
<br>
I think that would be great. I assume you will be leading this
session.<br>
<br>
I think it's a great opportunity for CAs with past experience
on delayed revocations to share some insight about specific
challenges in the sectors you listed, and possibly add some
that are missing.<br>
<br>
FYI, public evidence for delayed revocation incidents (open
and closed, based on specific tags) is available in
<a
href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?f1=OP&f4=CP&v2=ca-compliance&f2=status_whiteboard&o2=allwordssubstr&component=CA%20Certificate%20Compliance&query_format=advanced&list_id=17029100&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&v3=delayed-revocation%20leaf-revocation-delay&resolution=---&resolution=FIXED&resolution=INVALID&resolution=WONTFIX&resolution=DUPLICATE&resolution=WORKSFORME&o3=anywordssubstr&f3=status_whiteboard"
moz-do-not-send="true">
this link</a>.<br>
<br>
Although you mentioned that this affects the BR section 4.9.1,
this topic affects all Working Groups because all the WG BRs
have a section 4.9.1 that is pretty much similar with the TLS
BRs. With that said, I would like to ask if Members have any
objections for discussing this topic as part of the Forum
plenary.<br>
<br>
<br>
Thank you,<br>
Dimitris<br>
CA/B Forum Chair<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>