<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    Thanks Ben, happy to endorse.<br>
    <br>
    One minor nit, since there is no longer a "transition" phase, we
    should probably remove the part about the quorum that says:<br>
    <br>
    "For transition purposes, if three meetings have not yet occurred,
    quorum is ten (10)."<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    Best,<br>
    Dimitris.<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 18/10/2023 7:50 μ.μ., Ben Wilson
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CA+1gtaZ4OZVKAxPTztFXdGCgcqp8qF3EmQnNmk1BOyt9wfPaFw@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>Thanks for your input, Dimitris.</div>
        <div>I've amended section 4.d. as proposed - <a
href="https://github.com/cabforum/forum/commit/c6850e24eb49d5cfcb00eae4d11e82544504bffb"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://github.com/cabforum/forum/commit/c6850e24eb49d5cfcb00eae4d11e82544504bffb</a></div>
        <div>Thanks again,</div>
        <div>Ben<br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at
          3:03 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) <<a
            href="mailto:dzacharo@harica.gr" moz-do-not-send="true"
            class="moz-txt-link-freetext">dzacharo@harica.gr</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div> <br>
            Hello Ben,<br>
            <br>
            At <a
href="https://cabforum.org/2023/03/02/minutes-of-the-f2f-58-meeting-in-ottawa-canada-28-february-1-march-2023/"
              moz-do-not-send="true">F2F58 </a>we had a discussion
            about the <a
href="https://cabforum.org/wp-content/uploads/11-CABF_Lessons-learned-from-SC60.pdf"
              moz-do-not-send="true">lessons learned from ballot SC60</a>.
            During that meeting, a proposal was made that seems to fix
            the ambiguity of the current Bylaws.<br>
            <br>
            In line 93 of the proposed ballot, it says:<br>
            <br>
            <blockquote type="cite"><i>**(d)** There is a mandatory
                six-month probationary period during which any
                representative of an Applicant must attend at least 30%
                of all SCWG teleconferences (not counting subcommittee
                meetings) and at least one SCWG face-to-face meeting
                (either physically or virtually). After successful
                completion of the mandatory probationary period and
                meeting all requirements of section 3(a) or 3(b), an
                Applicant may become a Voting Member, if the SCWG
                determines by consensus among the Members during a
                Meeting or Teleconference, or upon the request of any
                Member, by a Ballot among the Members, that the
                Applicant meets the requirements of section 3(a) or
                3(b). Acceptance by consensus shall be determined, or a
                Ballot of the Members shall be held, as soon as the
                Applicant indicates that it has presented all
                information required and has responded to all follow-up
                questions from the SCWG and the Applicant has complied
                with the requirements of Section 5.5 of the CA/Browser
                Forum Bylaws.</i></blockquote>
            <br>
            Instead of:<br>
            <br>
            <i>"or upon the request of any Member, by a Ballot among the
              Members, by a Ballot among the Members, that the Applicant
              meets the requirements of section 3(a) or 3(b)" </i><br>
            <br>
            please update to:<br>
            <br>
            <i>"or upon the request of any Member that challenges the
              Applicant's adherence to all of the requirements
              of section 3(a) or 3(b), by a Ballot among the Members."</i><br>
            <br>
            I read the rest of the proposed changes and they look good.
            If you are ok with the change above, HARICA would be happy
            to endorse the ballot.<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            Best regards,<br>
            Dimitris.<br>
            <br>
            <div>On 13/10/2023 1:23 π.μ., Ben Wilson via Public wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div>All,</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>I am planning to introduce a Forum ballot to amend
                  the Server Certificate Working Group Charter.  <br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div>At a high level, here are some of the proposed
                    changes:</div>
                  <ul>
                    <li>Section numbering added</li>
                    <li>"Root Certificate Issuer" voting category
                      removed</li>
                    <li>Membership requirements for Certificate
                      Consumers added</li>
                    <li>6-month probationary period prior to voting
                      membership added</li>
                    <li>Voting percentages and quorum clarified</li>
                  </ul>
                </div>
                <div> Because there are numerous proposed changes, here
                  are a diff and a blob for your review.</div>
                <div><a href="" moz-do-not-send="true"><br>
                  </a></div>
                <div><a
href="https://github.com/cabforum/forum/compare/59185f16917cc7f5b83564fe5fddff32cf84c8ce...85e569a43a5a2c9e5e16ce8bf1e569a98cfbd720"
                    moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://github.com/cabforum/forum/compare/59185f16917cc7f5b83564fe5fddff32cf84c8ce...85e569a43a5a2c9e5e16ce8bf1e569a98cfbd720</a></div>
                <div>
                  <div><a
href="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/goog_919727603"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"><br>
                    </a></div>
                  <div><a
href="https://github.com/cabforum/forum/blob/BenWilson-SCWG-charter-1.3/SCWG-charter.md"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://github.com/cabforum/forum/blob/BenWilson-SCWG-charter-1.3/SCWG-charter.md</a></div>
                  <br>
                  <div>I look forward to your comments and suggestions.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Thanks,</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Ben<br>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
              <br>
              <fieldset></fieldset>
              <pre>_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
<a href="mailto:Public@cabforum.org" moz-do-not-send="true"
              class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Public@cabforum.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public"
              moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public</a>
</pre>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>