<div dir="ltr">Did anyone else want to declare their membership in this new NetSec WG (by sending a declaration of intent to participate to the questions list)? I think we were planning on having the first meeting tomorrow, and we'll be sending out a new meeting invite.<br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 8:18 AM Dean Coclin via Public <<a href="mailto:public@cabforum.org" target="_blank">public@cabforum.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-US"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt">Slight correction to the voting results: the number of CAs voting yes is 22, not 23. The error was in the first bullet below.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt">Dean Coclin<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><div><div style="border-color:rgb(225,225,225) currentcolor currentcolor;border-style:solid none none;border-width:1pt medium medium;padding:3pt 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Public <<a href="mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org" target="_blank">public-bounces@cabforum.org</a>> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Dean Coclin via Public<br><b>Sent:</b> Monday, December 27, 2021 6:13 PM<br><b>To:</b> CABforum1 <<a href="mailto:public@cabforum.org" target="_blank">public@cabforum.org</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> [cabfpub] Voting Results Announcement for FORUM-17<u></u><u></u></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:black">The voting on ballot FORUM-17 has completed, and the ballot has passed.</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:black"> </span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:13pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:rgb(36,64,132)">Voting Results</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:rgb(24,40,80)">Certificate Issuers</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:black">22 votes total, with no abstentions:</span><u></u><u></u></p><ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc"><li class="MsoNormal" style="color:black;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><s><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif">23</span></s><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif"> 22 Yes votes: Buypass, Certum (Asseco), D-TRUST, DigiCert, Disig, eMudhra, Entrust, E-TUGRA, GDCA, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, HARICA, JPRS, Let's Encrypt/ISRG, MSC Trustgate, OISTE, SECOM, Sectigo, SSL.com, SwissSign, Telia Company, SecureTrust, </span><u></u><u></u></li><li class="MsoNormal" style="color:black;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif">0 No Votes</span><u></u><u></u></li><li class="MsoNormal" style="color:black;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif">0 Abstentions</span><u></u><u></u></li></ul><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:black">NOTE: A vote placed by GlobalTrust was not received on the public list and will not be counted.</span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:rgb(24,40,80)">Certificate Consumers</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:black">2 votes total, with no abstentions:</span><u></u><u></u></p><ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc"><li class="MsoNormal" style="color:black;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif">2 Yes votes: Google, Mozilla, </span><u></u><u></u></li><li class="MsoNormal" style="color:black;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif">0 No votes</span><u></u><u></u></li><li class="MsoNormal" style="color:black;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif">0 Abstentions</span><u></u><u></u></li></ul><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:13pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:rgb(36,64,132)"> </span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:13pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:rgb(36,64,132)">Bylaw Requirements</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:black">1.</span><span style="font-size:7pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"> </span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:black">Bylaw 2.3(f) requires:</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.75in;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:black">A "yes" vote by two-thirds of Certificate Issuer votes and by 50%-plus-one of Certificate Consumer votes. Votes to abstain are not counted for this purpose.<br><i>This requirement was MET for Certificate Issuers and MET for Certificate Consumers.</i></span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.75in;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:black">At least one Certificate Issuer and one Certificate Consumer Member must vote in favor of a ballot for the ballot to be adopted.<br><i>This requirement was MET.</i></span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0.5in;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:black">2.</span><span style="font-size:7pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"> </span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:black">Bylaw 2.3(g) requires that a ballot result only be considered valid when “more than half of the number of currently active Members has participated”. Votes to abstain are counted in determining quorum. Half of the currently active members at the start of voting was 14, so the quorum was 15 for this ballot.<br><i>This requirement was MET.</i></span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:105%;font-family:"Georgia",serif"><br>----- NEXT STEPS - INSTRUCTIONS FOR CA/BROWSER FORUM MEMBERS -----<br><br>Existing CA/Browser Forum members must declare their intent to participate in the NetSec WG by email to </span><a href="mailto:questions@cabforum.org" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:105%;font-family:"Georgia",serif">questions@cabforum.org</span></a><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:105%;font-family:"Georgia",serif">, including a statement of the Voting Class by which they qualify and the names/email addresses of their designated representatives who will participate and who will vote. We recommend that this be done by January 15, 2022.<br><br>Once declarations of participation have been gathered, the NetSec WG’s acting chair will convene a meeting tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, January 18, 2022, at 2 PM EDT, the agenda for which will include:<br>- Adopting a list of initial members from the list of proposed, qualifying applicants in conformance with the NetSec WG Charter<br>- Appointing a Chair, Vice Chair, and Webmaster for the NetSec WG</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:105%;font-family:"Georgia",serif">- Discuss the WG’s first ballot – adoption of the Network and Certificate System Security Requirements (NCSSRs) and the IPR review period<br>- Outline the goals and deliverables of the NetSec WG</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:105%"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:105%;font-family:"Georgia",serif"> </span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:8pt;line-height:105%"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:105%;font-family:"Georgia",serif">In the interim, the NCSSRs remain a valid guideline of the CA/Browser Forum. Existing members of the working groups that have adopted the current NCSSRs are bound by the IPR Policy’s Royalty-Free license.</span><u></u><u></u></p></div></div></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
Public mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Public@cabforum.org" target="_blank">Public@cabforum.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public</a><br>
</blockquote></div>