<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-text-html" lang="x-western">
<div class="WordSection1"><br>
These are the Final Minutes of the Teleconference described in
the subject of this message. <b><br>
</b>
<h2 class="MsoNormal">Attendees (in alphabetical order)</h2>
Arno Fiedler (D-TRUST), Clint Wilson (Apple), Corey Bonnell
(SecureTrust), Chris Kemmerer (SSL.com), David Moeller
(Sectigo), Dean Coclin (Digicert), Dimitris Zacharopoulos
(HARICA), Doug Beattie (GlobalSign), Dustin Hollenback
(Microsoft), Enrico Entschew (D-TRUST), Inaba Atsushi
(GlobalSign), India Donald (US Federal PKI Management
Authority), Janet Hines (SecureTrust), Joanna Fox (GoDaddy),
Kirk Hall (Entrust Datacard), Leo Grove (SSL.com), Li-Chun Chen
(Chunghwa Telecom), Michelle Coon (OATI), Mike Reilly
(Microsoft), Neil Dunbar (TrustCor Systems), Patrick Nohe
(GlobalSign), Pedro Fuentes (OISTE Foundation), Peter Miskovic
(Disig), Rashmi Jha (Microsoft), Rich Smith (Sectigo), Robin
Alden (Sectigo), Ryan Sleevi (Google), Thanos Vrachnos
(SSL.com), Tim Callan (Sectigo), Timo Schmitt (SwissSign),
Tobias Josefowitz (Opera Software AS), Trevoli Ponds-White
(Amazon), Vincent Lynch (Digicert), Wayne Thayer (Mozilla).
<h2 class="MsoNormal">Minutes <br>
</h2>
<h3> 1. Roll Call<br>
</h3>
<h3> </h3>
The Chair took attendance.
<h3 class="MsoNormal">2. Read Antitrust Statement<br>
</h3>
<p class="MsoNormal">The Antitrust Statement was read. </p>
<h3 class="MsoNormal">3. Review Agenda<br>
</h3>
<p class="MsoNormal">Accepted without changes.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<h3 class="MsoNormal">4. Approval of minutes from last
teleconference <br>
</h3>
<p>Approved without objections.<br>
</p>
<h3 class="MsoNormal">5. Forum Infrastructure Subcommittee
update</h3>
<p>The subcommittee call lasted about 5 minutes because there
was not enough participation.<br>
</p>
<h3 class="MsoNormal">6. Code Signing Working Group update</h3>
<ul>
<li>The WG invited a representative from the Clean Software
Alliance (CSA) to the call. They were previously associated
with Microsoft and now they are an independent organization.
They will look at potential synergies between CSA and the
CA/B Forum working groups. There was also interest in the
validation subcommittee so Dean will send an email to the
subcommittee Chair about that. Dean described the structure
of the Forum and will have a follow-up call with their
representative. They also invited Forum Members to attend a
meeting in LA at the end of the month. Some browsers and OS
vendors will be participating.<br>
</li>
<li>The February Summit is being postponed for March. A new
Doodle poll will be circulated.</li>
<li>Discussed about improvements in validating and vetting for
code signing certificates. <br>
</li>
<li>Tomas talked about key attestation and some customers
having problems proving possession of keys in cloud
instances, using Google cloud HSM as an example. This
affects section 16.3 of the Code Signing BRs. Each Vendor
has a proprietary solution and we need to modify the BRs for
Code Signing with appropriate language to take the remote
key attestation into account when subscriber keys are
generated remotely. There was a suggestion to review Adobe's
AATL Policy for guidance.</li>
</ul>
<h3 class="MsoNormal">7. Follow-up on new S/MIME WG Charter</h3>
<p>There is some debate on the draft language of the S/MIME
charter that seem to allow the case where an S/MIME
Certificate may not contain an email address. This is very
close to being completed.<br>
</p>
<h3 class="MsoNormal">8. Action items from F2F 48 </h3>
<p>Dimitris went over the list of pending actions from the last
F2F. Most of the topics related to the Bylaws have been
incorporated in a draft next revision of the Bylaws. Arno is
planning to get feedback about the ETSI update next week at
the scheduled ETSI ESI F2F meeting.<br>
</p>
<h3 class="MsoNormal">9. Topics for F2F 49</h3>
No suggestions.<br>
<h3 class="MsoNormal">10. Draft next revision of the Bylaws</h3>
Dimitris went over the main updates proposed in the next
revision of the Bylaws that were circulated in the public list.
There were no objections for the suggested changes. Dimitris
plans on discussing a couple more issues at the next F2F and
then prepare a ballot for updating the Bylaws. Due to the fact
that some Members require legal review for Bylaws changes, we
try to keep these changes limited to once a year.<br>
<ul>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<h3 class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:1.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:1.0pt;margin-left:0in">11.
Any Other Business</h3>
<p>Patrick mentioned that accommodation information for F2F 51
is available on the wiki. Globalsign has added hotel
information and there are special rates for Members. However,
some of them require early booking until the end of March
2020.<br>
</p>
<ul>
</ul>
<h3 class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:1.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:1.0pt;margin-left:0in">12.
Next call<br>
</h3>
February 6, 2020 at 11:00 am Eastern Time.
<h3 class="MsoNormal">Adjourned</h3>
<h3><b>F2F Meeting Schedule: </b></h3>
<ul>
<li>2020: Feb<font color="#ff0000"> <font color="#000000">18-20
</font></font>Bratislava (Disig), June 9-11 Minneapolis
(OATI), October 20-22 Tokyo (GlobalSign)</li>
<li>2021: Feb-March Dubai (DarkMatter), May 25-27 Poland
(Asseco-Certum), October - San Jose, CA or RTP, NC (Cisco)</li>
<li>2022: Mar-April New Delhi / Bengaluru (e-Mudhra), June - <font
color="#ff0000">[Open]</font>, October <font
color="#ff0000">[Open]</font></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>