<div dir="ltr"><div><div>Hi Tim,<br></div></div><div><br></div><div>Could you point to where that's reflected in the minutes? Our understanding here at Google is that Apple's proposed changes, which we support and would be unable to participate without incorporating, is that it accurately and correctly reflects the discussions in London [1], reiterated in Cupertino [2], and agreed upon in Thessaloniki [3]. It appears that, following that, the proposers of that ballot ignored that consensus and conclusion, and yet the discussion of Guangzhou [4] does not indicate there was consensus to do so.</div><div><br></div><div>I'm hoping we've just overlooked something in the minutes, but Apple's proposed changes seem imminently reasonable, and a worthwhile path to drafting requirements that consuming software, such as mail clients (both native and Web), can use and consume as part of their root programs, as an alternative to their root-program-specific requirements.</div><div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="https://cabforum.org/2018/06/06/minutes-for-ca-browser-forum-f2f-meeting-44-london-6-7-june-2018/#New-SMIME-Working-Group-Charter">https://cabforum.org/2018/06/06/minutes-for-ca-browser-forum-f2f-meeting-44-london-6-7-june-2018/#New-SMIME-Working-Group-Charter</a></div><div>[2] <a href="https://cabforum.org/2019/05/03/minutes-for-ca-browser-forum-f2f-meeting-46-cupertino-12-14-march-2019/#Creation-of-additional-Working-Groups---Secure-Mail">https://cabforum.org/2019/05/03/minutes-for-ca-browser-forum-f2f-meeting-46-cupertino-12-14-march-2019/#Creation-of-additional-Working-Groups---Secure-Mail</a></div><div>"<span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:"Droid Sans",Arial,Verdana,sans-serif;font-size:13px">Dean – We have a blank slate here and it seems the reluctance was to make it a narrow scope and then focus on either one aspect of SMIME. First task might be how to validate an email, and then focus on identity validation. Some comments were to make the chart narrow to focus on one task while others say to include all proposed tasks to not have to recharter which has caused issues in the past."</span></div><div>[3] <a href="https://cabforum.org/2019/08/16/minutes-for-ca-browser-forum-f2f-meeting-47-thessaloniki-12-13-june-2019/#Creation-of-Additional-Groups---Secure-Mail">https://cabforum.org/2019/08/16/minutes-for-ca-browser-forum-f2f-meeting-47-thessaloniki-12-13-june-2019/#Creation-of-Additional-Groups---Secure-Mail</a><br></div><div>"<span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:"Droid Sans",Arial,Verdana,sans-serif;font-size:13px">Eventually, all parties in the conversation came to the conclusion that it would behoove the Forum to scope the working group charter to domain validation, first, before adding other functionality once that portion was locked-down."</span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:"Droid Sans",Arial,Verdana,sans-serif;font-size:13px">[4] </span><a href="https://cabforum.org/2019/12/12/minutes-for-ca-browser-forum-f2f-meeting-48-guangzhou-5-7-november-2019/#Creation-of-Additional-Groups---Secure-Mail">https://cabforum.org/2019/12/12/minutes-for-ca-browser-forum-f2f-meeting-48-guangzhou-5-7-november-2019/#Creation-of-Additional-Groups---Secure-Mail</a></div><div><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:"Droid Sans",Arial,Verdana,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br></span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:"Droid Sans",Arial,Verdana,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br></span></div></div>