<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-text-html" lang="x-western">
<div class="WordSection1"><br>
These are the Final Minutes of the Teleconference described in
the subject of this message.
<h2 class="MsoNormal">Attendees (in alphabetical order)</h2>
Arno Fiedler (D-TRUST), Ben Wilson (Digicert), Chris Kemmerer
(SSL.com), Daymion Reynolds (GoDaddy), Dean Coclin (Digicert),
Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA), Doug Beattie (GlobalSign),
Dustin Hollenback (Microsoft), Enrico Entschew (D-TRUST), Fotis
Loukos (SSL.com), Frank Corday (SecureTrust), Inaba Atsushi
(GlobalSign), India Donald (US Federal PKI Management
Authority), Joanna Fox (GoDaddy), Jos Purvis (Cisco Systems),
Kirk Hall (Entrust Datacard), Marcelo Silva (Visa), Michael
Guenther (SwissSign), Michelle Coon (OATI), Mike Reilly
(Microsoft), Neil Dunbar (TrustCor Systems), Rich Smith
(Sectigo), Scott Rea (Dark Matter), Shelley Brewer (Digicert),
Tim Callan (Sectigo), Tim Hollebeek (Digicert), Tim Shirley
(SecureTrust), Trevoli Ponds-White (Amazon), Wayne Thayer
(Mozilla), Wendy Brown (US Federal PKI Management Authority).
<h2 class="MsoNormal">Minutes <br>
</h2>
<h3> 1. Roll Call<br>
</h3>
The Chair took attendance<br>
<h3 class="MsoNormal">2. Read Antitrust Statement<br>
</h3>
<p class="MsoNormal">The Antitrust Statement was read </p>
<h3 class="MsoNormal">3. Review Agenda<br>
</h3>
<p class="MsoNormal">Today's Agenda was approved. Dimitris
mentioned that the Code Signing Working Group update slot was
added to the agenda similarly to the Infrastructure Working
Group. No objections were raised to this permanent addition.<br>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<h3 class="MsoNormal">4. Pending minutes from F2F 46</h3>
The minutes from F2F 46 are almost complete. Dimitris sent a
reminder to a few minute-takers that haven't added the minutes
of some sessions and will send another reminder on Friday April
5th.
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<h3>5. Forum Infrastructure Working Group update</h3>
Jos reported that the conversion of the wiki from Moin-Moin to
DocuWiki was successful. All items (including tables,
attachments) were converted. The only thing missing, is the
history of changes to the various wiki pages. The plan is to
keep the current wiki available online for a few months on a
separate URL for anyone that wants to review history of pages,
and then the old wiki will be archived and stored in the new
virtual server in case it is needed in the future.<br>
<br>
The WG is waiting to find the compute location to migrate the
existing mailers and wiki. There is already a documented plan
which includes the necessary technical steps that need to take
place for this migration.<br>
<br>
There was also a discussion around document management and a
follow-up to the hackathon we had at the last F2F to handle some
pending issues with the automated document creation, namely the
cover page, table of contents, and some formatting issues with
sections that are numbered 6 levels down. This last issue will
probably be addressed by a ballot to just restructure the
existing information of section 7.1.2 (no change to the actual
requirements) in order to be readable more easily and not 6
levels down.<br>
<br>
The WG is still working on how to automatically create red-lined
versions.<br>
<h3 class="MsoNormal">6. Code Signing Working Group update </h3>
Dean reported that the CSCWG had a meeting in which they
ratified some new WG members. There is good participation from
Certificate Issuers, Interested Parties and Associate Members
but lacking participation of Certificate Consumers. The WG will
try to approach other organizations that might be interested in
joining the Code Signing Certificate WG, and Dean volunteered to
draft a message to be sent to various organizations.<br>
<br>
The current code signing guidelines that were developed some
years ago, were not adopted by the Forum so they may still have
some Intellectual Property issues. The WG decided to bring these
guidelines to a ballot to deal with these IPR issues, resolve
them and then proceed with any fixes or updates to those
documents. Some fixes have already been identified but they will
be addressed once the IPR issues are resolved.<br>
<h3 class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:1.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:1.0pt;margin-left:0in">7.
Follow-up on new S/MIME WG Charter</h3>
<br>
Dean reported that Tim H. will be working on that Charter after
reviewing the minutes of the last F2F.<br>
<h3 class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:1.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:1.0pt;margin-left:0in">8.
Instructions for Hosting a F2F meeting</h3>
Dimitris sent a message to the management list with a link to a
Google Document that contains instructions and expectations for
members that volunteer to host a F2F meeting. There were no
objections to the items listed in this document. He will
continue to work on this document and include feedback received
from members who hosted F2F meetings in the past with a goal to
send this document to the members that will host F2F meetings in
the future.<br>
<h3 class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:1.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:1.0pt;margin-left:0in">9.
Any Other Business</h3>
None.<br>
<h3 class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:1.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:1.0pt;margin-left:0in">10.
Bylaws and existing Charters update </h3>
<br>
Wayne gave a brief outline of the latest changes introduced in
the latest document update.<br>
<br>
There are some open questions based on the F2F meeting:<br>
- Forum membership and whether we need to make any adjustments
to the currently proposed language. Currently, if a member is
not a member of a CWG, this member is automatically removed from
the Forum. If members want to propose specific changes, please
contact Wayne with specific recommendations.<br>
- The Infrastructure WG should be converted to a Subcommittee of
the Forum and the question was whether we want to address this
in the Bylaws update ballot or in a separate ballot. There was
consensus on the call to create a separate ballot to "terminate"
the WG and "charter" a Forum Infrastructure Subcommittee at the
Forum level in the same ballot. This would be similar to a
"convert" function.<br>
- At the F2F we agreed that we don't need separate Questions
list for each WG but the Questions list coordinator should be in
a position to route the question to the appropriate WG. The
Bylaws should be updated to reflect this.<br>
<br>
The next step is to create a red-line of the Bylaws update.
Since this ballot includes several changes, people must review
the red-line before it is entered in the discussion period.
Dimitris volunteered to review the Bylaws red-line when it is
prepared by Wayne. The discussion period will be at least 2
weeks before put to a vote.<br>
<h3 class="MsoNormal">11. Next call</h3>
<p class="MsoNormal">April 18, 2019 at 11:00 am Eastern Time.</p>
<h3 class="MsoNormal">Adjourned</h3>
<h3><b>F2F Meeting Schedule: </b></h3>
<ul>
<li>2019: June 11-13, 2019 – Greece (HARICA), October 28-31–
Guangzhou (GDCA)</li>
<li>2020: Feb-March<font color="#ff0000"> </font>Bratislava
(Disig), June – Minneapolis (OATI), October – Tokyo
(GlobalSign)</li>
<li>2021: Feb-March Dubai (DarkMatter), June – Poland
(Asseco-Certum), October <font color="#ff0000">[Open]</font></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>