<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
I made the following updates in addition to Wayne's:<br>
<ul>
<li>Added a process for Interested Party application to CWGs as it
seemed to be missing from the Bylaws. The only reference we
currently have is on the web site (<a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://cabforum.org/email-lists/"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://cabforum.org/email-lists/</a>).</li>
<li>For the Server Certificate Working Group membership criteria,
I tried to align with section 8.4 of the BRs.<br>
</li>
<li>On the last call, we also agreed to add sample Membership
criteria to the new Working Group Charter section. I added a
simplified version of criteria based on section 8.4 of the BRs,
including Government internal audit schemes that might also be
acceptable for the S/MIME Working Group.</li>
<li>Following the example of moving the membership criteria to the
CWG Charters, I moved the "end membership" section to the Server
Certificate Working Group Charter AND the template for new WG
Charters. I believe that there was agreement that each Working
Group should determine their own rules for ending Working Group
membership, similar to determining the criteria for joining a
working group.<br>
</li>
</ul>
I hope you will find these changes acceptable and of course please
send any comments on these additional changes.<br>
<br>
Dimitris.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/2/2019 12:51 π.μ., Wayne Thayer
via Public wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAJE6Z6cGCmGjPMXRdaKWveN+WnTvB0ufRCKccOMBOa5BoC8aJw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr"><font size="2">On today's call we discussed an
alternative approach to updating Bylaws section 2.1: change
the Forum level membership requirement to:<br>
<br>
CWG Members are automatically granted Forum membership.<br>
<br>
Then ensure that all CWG charters specify appropriate
membership criteria. This approach has some advantages:<br>
* Each CWG can tailor membership requirements to their scope
without worrying about conflicting with Forum requirements<br>
* Eliminates the Forum application process that currently
requires Applicants to submit the same information to both the
SCWG and the Forum<br>
* Clarifies the intent that CWG members must be Forum members
as well<br>
<br>
I have drafted these changes in the document at the link I
sent out on the Management list earlier today:<br>
* Replaced all of the membership language in section 2.1 with
the statement above<br>
* Added requirements in section 5.3.1 for CWGs to specify
membership criteria for each supported category of membership
that is defined in the Bylaws (Certificate Issuer, Certificate
Consumer, Associate Member, Interested Party)<br>
* Added section 3 on Membership to the CWG Charter template in
Exhibit C<br>
</font>
<div><font size="2">* Added the current SCWG Charter to the end
of the doc and moved the membership criteria from the Bylaws
(with most proposed changes that were discussed earlier in
this thread) into this new version of the SCWG Charter</font></div>
<div><font size="2"><br>
</font></div>
<div><font size="2">I also experimented with moving Bylaws
section 2.2 "Ending Forum Membership" to the SCWG Charter,
but I don't think that's necessary.<br>
</font></div>
<div><font size="2"><br>
</font></div>
<div><font size="2">I would appreciate everyone's review and
comments on these changes.</font></div>
<div><font size="2"><br>
</font></div>
<div><font size="2">If we go ahead with this, I suspect that
there are other changes we should make to the SCWG Charter -
feel free to add your suggestions to the doc.</font></div>
<div><font size="2"><br>
</font></div>
<div><font size="2">Thanks,</font></div>
<div><font size="2"><br>
</font></div>
<div><font size="2">Wayne<br>
</font></div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Public@cabforum.org" moz-do-not-send="true">Public@cabforum.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public" moz-do-not-send="true">https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>