<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font face="Calibri">Actalis votes "yes".</font><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Il 26/09/2018 20:03, Kirk Hall via
Public ha scritto:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:c4fd0f630dc1426b82c62576aaf2aba4@PMSPEX04.corporate.datacard.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Voting
has started on this ballot, and will end on
</span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">October
3 at 16:00 UTC</span><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">
Servercert-wg [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:servercert-wg-bounces@cabforum.org">mailto:servercert-wg-bounces@cabforum.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 19, 2018 8:49 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public
Discussion List <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:servercert-wg@cabforum.org"><servercert-wg@cabforum.org></a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [EXTERNAL][Servercert-wg] Ballot SC9 v4 –
Establish the Validation Subcommittee of the SCWG<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Here is an updated version of this
ballot that will allow the Validation WG to continue as
a Subcommittee after the October 3rd sunset for Legacy
Working Groups that is built into our new bylaws. I have
attempted to incorporate the feedback received on Kirk's
earlier versions of the ballot into this version. Note
that v3 of this ballot was never circulated.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I am beginning the discussion period
for this ballot immediately in hopes that we can get
this passed 2 weeks from today and avoid any temporary
gap in which the Validation Subcommittee does not
formally exist. I would appreciate it if you would
review this ASAP and provide any feedback that might
require us to restart the discussion period.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">=================<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Purpose
of Ballot<br>
<br>
The Validation Working Group of the CA/Browser Forum
will expire on October 3, 2018 under the provisions of
the new Bylaws adopted in Ballot 206. The Server
Certificate Working Group wishes to establish a
Validation Subcommittee pursuant to the provisions of
Bylaws Section 5.3.1(e). This ballot is based on the
language in Ballot 143 which was approved by the Forum
Members for formally establishing the legacy Validation
Working Group in 2015:
<a
href="https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group"
moz-do-not-send="true">
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group</a><br>
<br>
The following motion has been proposed by Wayne Thayer
of Mozilla and endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and
Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA.<br>
<br>
--- MOTION BEGINS ---<br>
<br>
The Server Certificate Working Group hereby establishes
the Validation Subcommittee as an official Subcommittee
of the Server Certificate Working Group (SCWG).
<br>
<br>
* Mission: To improve the information validation
practices encoded in the guidelines maintained by the
SCWG.<br>
<br>
* End Date: This Subcommittee shall continue until such
time as it is dissolved by a ballot of the SCWG.
<br>
<br>
* Initial Chair: Tim Hollebeek shall be the initial
Chair of the Validation Subcommittee. The Subcommittee
may change its Chair and may choose and change a Vice
Chair from time to time by consensus of the Members
participating in the Subcommittee.<br>
<br>
* Scope: The scope of this Subcommittee is to address
issues arising under adopted CA/Browser Forum guidelines
and requirements related to the validation of
certificate information and the inclusion of information
in certificates. The Subcommittee will consider all
matters relating to the validation and inclusion of
information in certificates under adopted CA/Browser
Forum guidelines and requirements.<br>
<br>
* Deliverables: Ballots recommending improvements
related to the matters that are within the scope of this
Subcommittee.<br>
<br>
Participation: Any member of the SCWG is eligible and
may declare their participation in the Validation
Subcommittee by requesting to be added to the mailing
list.<br>
<br>
Communication: Subcommittee communications and
documents shall be posted on mailing lists where the
mail-archives are publicly accessible. The Subcommittee
shall publish minutes of its meetings.<br>
<br>
* Effect of SCWG Charter or Forum Bylaws Amendment for
Subcommittees: In the event the SCWG Charter or the
CA/Browser Forum Bylaws is amended to add general rules
governing Chartered Working Group Subcommittees and how
they operate (“General Rules”), the provisions of the
General Rules shall take precedence over this charter.<br>
<br>
--- MOTION ENDS ---<br>
<br>
The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:<br>
<br>
Discussion (7 days)<br>
Start Time: 2018-09-19, 16:00 UTC<br>
End Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC<br>
<br>
Vote for approval (7 days)<br>
Start Time: 2018-09-26, 16:00 UTC<br>
End Time: 2018-10-03, 16:00 UTC<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">================<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Additional Information (not part of
ballot)<br>
<br>
* Ballot 143 – Formalization of Validation Working Group
(approved Feb 2015)<br>
<a
href="https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group</a><br>
<br>
The CA-Browser Forum formally establishes the Validation
Working Group as an official working group of the CAB
Forum, replacing the previous informal EV working group.
The scope of this working group is to address issues
arising under adopted CAB Forum standards related to the
validation of certificate information and the inclusion
of information in certificates.<br>
<br>
Scope: The Validation Working Group will consider all
matters relating to the validation and inclusion of
information in certificates under adopted CAB Forum
guidelines.<br>
<br>
Deliverables: The Working Group shall produce one or
more documents offering options to the Forum for
validation within the scope defined above.<br>
<br>
<br>
* Bylaws v1.9<br>
<br>
5.3.1 Formation of Chartered Working Groups<br>
(e) CWGs may establish any number of subcommittees
within its own Working Group to address any of such
CWG’s business (each, a “Subcommittee”). A CWG-created
Subcommittee needs to be approved by the CWG itself
according to the approval process set forth in the CWG
charter, but approval of the Forum is not necessary.
Subcommittees must exist under an approved CWG.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Public@cabforum.org">Public@cabforum.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public">https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>