CFCA votes YES<br><br>CFCA<div>Zhang Yi<br><blockquote name="replyContent" class="ReferenceQuote" style="padding-left:5px;margin-left:5px;border-left:#b6b6b6 2px solid;margin-right:0">-----原始邮件-----<br>
<b>发件人:</b><span id="rc_from">"Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public" <public@cabforum.org></span><br>
<b>发送时间:</b><span id="rc_senttime">2018-05-08 05:48:38 (星期二)</span><br>
<b>收件人:</b> public@cabforum.org<br>
<b>抄送:</b> <br>
<b>主题:</b> [cabfpub] Voting begins for Ballot 223 v2 - Update BR Section 8.4 for CA audit criteria<br><br>
The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos of
HARICA and endorsed by Moudrick M. Dadashov of SSC and Tim Hollebeek
from Digicert. <span class="anchor" id="line-6"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-7"></span>
<p class="line867"><strong>Background</strong>: <span class="anchor" id="line-8"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-9"></span></p>
<p class="line874">Section 8.4 of the Baseline Requirements
describes the audit criteria for CAs that issue Publicly-Trusted
SSL/TLS Certificates. This ballot attempts to achieve two things:
<span class="anchor" id="line-10"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-11"></span></p>
<ol type="1">
<li>Remove the old ETSI TS documents <span class="anchor" id="line-12"></span></li>
<li>
<p class="line862">Align the <span class="nonexistent">WebTrust</span>
and ETSI requirements <span class="anchor" id="line-13"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-14"></span></p>
</li>
</ol>
<p class="line862">"<span class="nonexistent">WebTrust</span> for
Certification Authorities" is equivalent to "ETSI EN 319 401" and
"<span class="nonexistent">WebTrust</span> Principles and Criteria
for Certification Authorities – SSL Baseline with Network
Security" combined with "<span class="nonexistent">WebTrust</span>
for Certification Authorities" is equivalent to "ETSI EN 319
411-1". <span class="anchor" id="line-15"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-16"></span></p>
<p class="line867"><strong>-- MOTION BEGINS --</strong> <span class="anchor" id="line-17"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-18"></span></p>
<p class="line874">Replace the first two numbered items in section
8.4 from: <span class="anchor" id="line-19"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-20"></span></p>
<ol type="1">
<li>
<p class="line891"><span class="nonexistent">WebTrust</span> for
Certification Authorities v2.0; <span class="anchor" id="line-21"></span></p>
</li>
<li>A national scheme that audits conformance to ETSI TS 102 042 /
ETSI EN 319 411-1; or <span class="anchor" id="line-22"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-23"></span></li>
</ol>
<p class="line874">to: <span class="anchor" id="line-24"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-25"></span></p>
<ol type="1">
<li>
<p class="line862">"<span class="nonexistent">WebTrust</span>
for CAs v2.0 or newer" AND "<span class="nonexistent">WebTrust</span>
for CAs SSL Baseline with Network Security v2.2 or newer"; or
<span class="anchor" id="line-26"></span></p>
</li>
<li>ETSI EN 319 411-1, which includes normative references to ETSI
EN 319 401 (the latest version of the referenced ETSI documents
should be applied); or</li>
</ol>
<p class="line867"><strong>-- MOTION ENDS --</strong> <span class="anchor" id="line-29"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-30"></span></p>
<p class="line874">The procedure for this ballot is as follows
(exact start and end times may be adjusted to comply with
applicable Bylaws and IPR Agreement): <span class="anchor" id="line-31"></span></p>
<div>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="" #E0E0FF& quot" ;
background-color: "&quot"">
<p class="line891"><strong>BALLOT 223 v2 Status: Update BR
Section 8.4 for CA audit criteria</strong> </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" style="" #E0E0FF& quot; ;
text-align:center" ; background-color:
"&quot"">
<p class="line891"><strong>Start time (22:00 UTC)</strong>
</p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" style="" #E0E0FF& quot; ;
text-align:center" ; background-color:
"&quot"">
<p class="line891"><strong>End time (22:00 UTC)</strong> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="anchor" id="line-32"></span>
<p class="line862">Discussion (7+ days) </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" style=""
text-align:center"">
<p class="line862">30 April 2018 </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" style=""
text-align:center"">
<p class="line862">7 May 2018 </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="anchor" id="line-33"></span>
<p class="line862">Vote for approval (7 days) </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" style=""
text-align:center"">
<p class="line862">8 May 2018<br>
</p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" style=""
text-align:center"">
<p class="line862">15 May 2018<br>
</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="" & quot; text-align:left;
& quot; ""><span class="anchor" id="line-34"></span>
<p class="line862">If vote approves ballot: Review Period
(Chair to send Review Notice) (30 days)<br>
If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is
rescinded and PAG to be created.<br>
If no Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes effective
at end of Review Period.<br>
Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this
thread on the Public Mail List. </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" style=""
text-align:center"">
<p class="line862">Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2" style=""
text-align:center"">
<p class="line862">30 days after filing of Review Notice
by Chair </p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<span class="anchor" id="line-35"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-36"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-37"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-38"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-39"></span>
<p class="line874">From the Bylaws section 2.4(a): "If the Draft
Guideline Ballot is proposing a Final Maintenance Guideline, such
ballot will include a redline or comparison showing the set of
changes from the Final Guideline section(s) intended to become a
Final Maintenance Guideline, and need not include a copy of the
full set of guidelines. Such redline or comparison shall be made
against the Final Guideline section(s) as they exist at the time a
ballot is proposed, and need not take into consideration other
ballots that may be proposed subsequently, except as provided in
Section 2.4(j) below". <span class="anchor" id="line-40"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-41"></span></p>
<p class="line862">Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to
this thread on the Public list. A vote in favor of the motion must
indicate a clear 'yes' in the response. A vote against must
indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to abstain must
indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will
not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative
of a voting member before the close of the voting period will be
counted. Voting members are listed here: <a class="https" href="https://cabforum.org/members/" target="_blank">https://cabforum.org/members/</a>
<span class="anchor" id="line-42"></span><span class="anchor" id="line-43"></span></p>
In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the
votes cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the
votes cast by members in the browser category must be in favor.
Quorum is shown on CA/Browser Forum wiki. Under the Bylaws section
2.3(g), at least the required quorum number must participate in the
ballot for the ballot to be valid, either by voting in favor, voting
against, or abstaining.
</blockquote></div>