<html><div><div><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'>Dear Ben,</span></div><div><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'><br>
</span></div><div><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'> I just found Rufus is not a member. So what about discussion in Policy reviewing WG to propose a ballot to solve the issue. Besides, I suggest to confirm from Jeff or Don of CPA and ETSI, which definition is better:</span></div><div><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'> Qualified Auditor: An independent public accounting firm that meets the auditing qualification requirements as defined in Section 8.3 of the Baseline Requirements</span></div><div><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'> or </span></div><div><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'> Qualified Auditor: A natural person or Legal Entity that meets the auditing qualification requirements as defined in Section 8.3 of the Baseline Requirements</span></div><div><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'> Are there any case a natural person to conduct WebTrust for CA audit or ETSI audit now? or An independent public accounting firm or Legal Entity is better.</span></div><div><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'><br>
I am sorry that now the teleconference time of Policy reviewing WG is at 1:00 AM to 2:00 in Taipei. Because it is sleeping time that I can't join. But I can join the discussion in CP WG List or Public List.</span></div><div><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'><br>
</span></div><div><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'>Sincerely Yours,</span></div><div><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'><br>
</span></div><div><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'> Li-Chun</span></div><div><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'> <font size="3"> Deputy Senior Engineer</font><div> CISSP, CISA, CISM, PMP</div><div> Chunghwa Telecom </div><div> Taiwan </div></span><div></div></div></div><div><br>
-----Original message-----<br>
<b>From:</b>realsky(CHT)<realsky@cht.com.tw><br>
<b>To:</b>Barry Kilborn<B.Kilborn@quovadisglobal.com>,public<public@cabforum.org>,questions<questions@cabforum.org><br>
<b>Cc:</b>realsky<realsky@cht.com.tw><br>
<b>Date: </b> Wed, 07 Feb 2018 22:41:32<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cabfquest] Wrong reference in BRGs, chapter 8.4<br>
<div>Dear Rufus,</div><div><br>
</div><div> Besides, In writing BR assessment, I found there is another wrong reference in the Section 1.6 of BR. The defitinon of "Qualified Auditor" is read as Qualified Auditor : A natural person or Legal Entity that meets the requirements of Section 8.3. It should be "Qualified Auditor : A natural person or Legal Entity that meets the requirements of Section 8.2." I think the wrong reference is from the conversion of BR V1.2.5 or earlier version to RFC 3647 verison of BR. (Version 1.3.0/ Version 1.2.5 :Qualified Auditor: A natural person or Legal Entity that meets the requirements of Section 8.3 (Auditor Qualifications).) . Please see attached file or <a href="https://cabforum.org/baseline-requirements-documents/">https://cabforum.org/baseline-requirements-documents/</a> </div><div><br>
</div><div> If you read EVGL, then the defition of Qualified Auditor is correct. Qualified Auditor: An independent public accounting firm that meets the auditing qualification requirements specified in Section 17.6 of these Guidelines.</div><div><br>
</div><div> And you will see section 17.6 as </div><div>17.6. Auditor Qualification<br>
A Qualified Auditor (as defined in Section 8.2 of the Baseline Requirements) MUST perform the CA’s audit.</div><div><br>
</div><div> If you propose these amendment, I will endorse the ballot. </div><div> </div><div>Sincerely Yours, </div><div><br>
</div><div><br>
</div><div> Li-Chun Chen</div><div> Deputy Senior Engineer</div><div> CISSP, CISA, CISM, PMP</div><div> Chunghwa Telecom </div><div> Taiwan</div><div><br>
-----Original message-----<br>
<b>From:</b>Buschart, Rufus<rufus.buschart@siemens.com><br>
<b>To:</b>questions@cabforum.org<questions@cabforum.org><br>
<b>Cc:</b>Barry Kilborn<B.Kilborn@quovadisglobal.com><br>
<b>Date: </b> Mon, 05 Feb 2018 19:05:01<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [外部郵件] [cabfquest] Wrong reference in BRGs, chapter 8.4<br>
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="2050" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<x-body>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'>Dear CA/B forum members!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'>It appear there is a wrong reference in the BRGs, chapter 8.4 “Topics covered by assessment”. This chapter includes the statement “The audit MUST be conducted
by a Qualified Auditor, as specified in Section 8.3.”. This should most probably read “as specified in Section 8.2” which describes “Identity/qualifications of assessor”. Section 8.3 is empty.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'>I would propose, this should be changed in one of the upcoming ballots. I would post this directly to the mailing list, but as not being a member, I’m prohibited
from posting.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'>Best regards<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'>Rufus</span><span style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'><br>
Siemens AG<br>
Information Technology<br>
Human Resources<br>
PKI / Trustcenter<br>
GS IT HR 7 4<br>
Hugo-Junkers-Str. </span><span style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'>9<br>
90411 Nnberg, Deutschland<br>
Tel.: +49 1522 2894134<br>
<a href="mailto:rufus.buschart@siemens.com"><span style="color: blue;">mailto:rufus.buschart@siemens.com</span></a><br>
<a href="https://siemens.com/ingenuityforlife"><span style="color: blue;">www.siemens.com/ingenuityforlife</span></a><br>
</span><span style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'><img width="240" height="87" id="_x0000_i1025" alt="www.siemens.com/ingenuityforlife" src="cid:5A7B1F97$9AEF2Erealsky@cht.com.tw" border="0"></span><span style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10pt;'><br>
</span><span style='font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 8pt;'>Siemens Aktiengesellschaft: Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jim Hagemann Snabe; Vorstand: Joe Kaeser, Vorsitzender; Roland Busch, Lisa Davis, Klaus Helmrich, Janina Kugel, Cedrik Neike, Michael
Sen, Ralf P. Thomas; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin und Mchen, Deutschland; Registergericht: Berlin Charlottenburg, HRB 12300, Mchen, HRB 6684; WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 23691322</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</x-body>
_______________________________________________<br>
Questions mailing list<br>
Questions@cabforum.org<br>
<a href="https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/questions" target="new_win">https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/questions</a><br>
<br>
</div></div></html><br><html><div><div>本信件可能包含中華電信股份有限公司機密資訊,非指定之收件者,請勿蒐集、處理或利用本信件內容,並請銷毀此信件. 如為指定收件者,應確實保護郵件中本公司之營業機密及個人資料,不得任意傳佈或揭露,並應自行確認本郵件之附檔與超連結之安全性,以共同善盡資訊安全與個資保護責任. </div><div>Please be advised that this email message (including any attachments) contains confidential information and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and all attachments from your system and do not further collect, process, or use them. Chunghwa Telecom and all its subsidiaries and associated companies shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this email nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. If you are the intended recipient, please protect the confidential and/or personal information contained in this email with due care. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Also, please self-inspect attachments and hyperlinks contained in this email to ensure the information security and to protect personal information.</div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></html>