<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Apple votes YES.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Curt<br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Dec 7, 2017, at 8:52 AM, Ryan Sleevi via Public <<a href="mailto:public@cabforum.org" class="">public@cabforum.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><b class="">Ballot 217: Sunset RFC 2527</b><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Purpose of Ballot: The Baseline Requirements and Extended Validation Guidelines require that CA's disclosures of the Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statements include all of the material required by either RFC 2527 or RFC 3647 and structured in accordance with RFC 2527 or RFC 3647.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">RFC 2527 is an obsolete RFC, published in 1999, and replaced by RFC 3647 in 2003. This sunsets the use of RFC 2527, ensuring that CAs' disclosures will follow a consistent pattern across the industry, facilitating easier review by Subscribers, Browsers, and the broader community. Based upon Member feedback, 6 months is provided for CAs to review and update their CP/CPS documents.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">This motion aligns the language to be consistent between the BRs and the EVGs. For the benefit of minimal changes, this aligns the existing language through duplication, rather than attempting to incorporate the BRs by reference. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">The following motion has been proposed by Ryan Sleevi of Google and endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><b class="">-- MOTION BEGINS --</b></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">This ballot modifies the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates" as follows, based upon Version 1.5.1:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">In Section 2.2, replace the text:</div><div class="">"The CA SHALL publicly disclose its Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement through an appropriate and readily accessible online means that is available on a 24x7 basis. The CA SHALL publicly disclose its CA business practices to the extent required by the CA's selected audit scheme (see Section 8.1). The disclosures MUST include all the material required by RFC 2527 or RFC 3647, and MUST be structured in accordance with either RFC 2527 or RFC 3647. "</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">with the following:</div><div class="">"The CA SHALL publicly disclose its Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement through an appropriate and readily accessible online means that is available on a 24x7 basis. The CA SHALL publicly disclose its CA business practices to the extent required by the CA's selected audit scheme (see Section 8.1).</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Effective as of 31 May 2018, the Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be structured in accordance with RFC 3647. Prior to 31 May 2018, the Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be structured in accordance with either RFC 2527 or RFC 3647. The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST include all material required by RFC 3647 or, if structured as such, RFC 2527."<br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">This ballot modifies the "Guidelines for the Issuance and Management of Extended Validation Certificates" as follows, based on Version 1.6.6:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">In Section 8.2.2, replace the text:</div><div class="">"Each CA MUST publicly disclose their EV Policies through an appropriate and readily accessible online means that is available on a 24x7 basis. The CA is also REQUIRED to publicly disclose its CA business practices as required by WebTrust for CAs and ETSI TS 102 042 and ETSI EN 319 411-1. The disclosures MUST be structured in accordance with either RFC 2527 or RFC 3647."</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">With the following:</div><div class="">"Each CA MUST publicly disclose its Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement through an appropriate and readily accessible online means that is available on a 24x7 basis. The CA SHALL publicly disclose its CA business practices to the extent required by the CA's selected audit scheme (see Section 17.1).</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Effective as of 31 May 2018, the CA's Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be structured in accordance with RFC 3647. Prior to 31 May 2018, the CA's Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be structured in accordance with either RFC 2527 or RFC 3647. The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST include all material required by RFC 3647 or, if structured as such, RFC 2527."</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><b class="">-- MOTION ENDS --</b></div><div class=""><br class="">The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Discussion (7 to 14 days)</div><div class="">Start Time: 2017-12-07 22:00:00 UTC</div><div class="">End Time: 2017-12-14 22:00:00 UTC</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Vote for approval (7 days)</div><div class="">Start Time: 2017-12-14 22:00:00 UTC</div><div class="">End Time: 2017-12-21 22:00:00 UTC</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><div class="">Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the Public list. A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period will be counted. Voting members are listed here: <a href="https://cabforum.org/members/" class="">https://cabforum.org/members/</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast by members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is shown on CA/Browser Forum wiki. Under Bylaw 2.2(g), at least the required quorum number must participate in the ballot for the ballot to be valid, either by voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining.</div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">Public mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Public@cabforum.org" class="">Public@cabforum.org</a><br class="">https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>