<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>SSL.com votes yes.<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/20/2017 7:54 PM, Kirk Hall via
Public wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:88795d9cd4fb4255ab0e57948af35efc@PMSPEX04.corporate.datacard.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.PlainTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Plain Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text";
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Voting
has started on Ballot 214 – CAA Discovery CNAME Errata.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Technically,
the Discussion period ended at 22:00 UTC today (which was
3:00 pm Pacific Time). Josh, as the Proposer of the Ballot,
accepted Gerv and Tim’s email suggestion as to a 3-month
transition period, but this acceptance occurred at 5:05 pm
Pacific Time, two hours after the end of the discussion
period. Also, we don’t have specific amendment language to
consider, only a concept.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Regrettably,
I think it’s too late for this transition period amendment,
<b><u>so we are voting on Ballot 214 as originally proposed</u></b>
(see below). If there is a need for a transition period, I
think it’s best if it’s proposed by a separate ballot with
specific language.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">
Public [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org">mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Jacob Hoffman-Andrews via Public<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 13, 2017 2:31 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> CABFPub <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:public@cabforum.org"><public@cabforum.org></a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [EXTERNAL][cabfpub] Ballot 214: CAA
Discovery CNAME Errata<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Kicking off the official discussion
period for ballot 214 today per discussion with Phillip.<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">The following motion has been proposed
by Phillip Hallam-Baker of Comodo Group Inc. and endorsed
by Gervase Markham of Mozilla and Mads Egil Henriksveen of
Buypass.<br>
<br>
-- MOTION BEGINS --<br>
<br>
In the Baseline Requirements v1.4.9 Section 3.2.2.8. CAA
Records<br>
<br>
Strike:<br>
<br>
As part of the issuance process, the CA MUST check for a
CAA record for each dNSName in the subjectAltName
extension of the certificate to be issued, according to
the procedure in RFC 6844, following the processing
instructions set down in RFC 6844 for any records found.
If the CA issues, they MUST do so within the TTL of the
CAA record, or 8 hours, whichever is greater.<br>
<br>
Replace with:<br>
<br>
As part of the issuance process, the CA MUST check for CAA
records and follow the processing instructions for any
records found, for each dNSName in the subjectAltName
extension of the certificate to be issued, as specified in
RFC 6844 as amended by Errata 5065 (Appendix A). If the CA
issues, they MUST do so within the TTL of the CAA record,
or 8 hours, whichever is greater.<br>
<br>
<br>
In the Baseline Requirements ADD an Appendix A that reads:<br>
<br>
Appendix A -- RFC6844 Errata 5065<br>
<br>
The following errata report has been held for document
update for RFC6844, "DNS Certification Authority
Authorization (CAA) Resource Record".<br>
<br>
--------------------------------------<br>
You may review the report below and at:<br>
<a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5065"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5065</a><br>
<br>
--------------------------------------<br>
Status: Held for Document Update<br>
Type: Technical<br>
<br>
Reported by: Phillip Hallam-Baker <<a
href="mailto:philliph@comodo.com" moz-do-not-send="true">philliph@comodo.com</a>>
Date Reported: 2017-07-10 Held by: EKR (IESG)<br>
<br>
Section: 4<br>
<br>
Original Text<br>
-------------<br>
Let CAA(X) be the record set returned in response to
performing a CAA<br>
record query on the label X, P(X) be the DNS label
immediately above<br>
X in the DNS hierarchy, and A(X) be the target of a
CNAME or DNAME<br>
alias record specified at the label X.<br>
<br>
o If CAA(X) is not empty, R(X) = CAA (X), otherwise<br>
<br>
o If A(X) is not null, and R(A(X)) is not empty, then
R(X) =<br>
R(A(X)), otherwise<br>
<br>
o If X is not a top-level domain, then R(X) = R(P(X)),
otherwise<br>
<br>
o R(X) is empty.<br>
<br>
Corrected Text<br>
--------------<br>
Let CAA(X) be the record set returned in response to
performing a CAA<br>
record query on the label X, P(X) be the DNS label
immediately above<br>
X in the DNS hierarchy, and A(X) be the target of a
CNAME or DNAME<br>
alias record chain specified at the label X.<br>
<br>
o If CAA(X) is not empty, R(X) = CAA (X), otherwise<br>
<br>
o If A(X) is not null, and CAA(A(X)) is not empty,
then R(X) =<br>
CAA(A(X)), otherwise<br>
<br>
o If X is not a top-level domain, then R(X) = R(P(X)),
otherwise<br>
<br>
o R(X) is empty.<br>
<br>
Thus, when a search at node X returns a CNAME record,
the CA will<br>
follow the CNAME record chain to its target. If the
target label<br>
contains a CAA record, it is returned.<br>
<br>
Otherwise, the CA continues the search at<br>
the parent of node X.<br>
<br>
Note that the search does not include the parent of a
target of a<br>
CNAME record (except when the CNAME points back to its
own path).<br>
<br>
To prevent resource exhaustion attacks, CAs SHOULD limit
the length of<br>
CNAME chains that are accepted. However CAs MUST process
CNAME<br>
chains that contain 8 or fewer CNAME records.<br>
<br>
--Motion Ends--<br>
<br>
The procedure for approval of this Final Maintenance
Guideline ballot is as follows (exact start and end times
may be adjusted to comply with applicable Bylaws and IPR
Agreement):<br>
<br>
BALLOT 214 Status: Final Maintenance Guideline Start
time (22:00 UTC) End time (22:00 UTC)<br>
<br>
Discussion begins now and ends September 20, 2017 22:00
UTC (7 days)<br>
<br>
Vote for approval begins September 20, 2017 22:00 UTC and
ends September 27, 2017 22:00 UTC (7 days)<br>
<br>
If vote approves ballot: Review Period (Chair to send
Review Notice) (30 days). If Exclusion Notice(s) filed,
ballot approval is rescinded and PAG to be created. If no
Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes effective at end
of Review Period. Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair
30 days after filing of Review Notice by Chair<br>
<br>
From Bylaw 2.3: If the Draft Guideline Ballot is proposing
a Final Maintenance Guideline, such ballot will include a
redline or comparison showing the set of changes from the
Final Guideline section(s) intended to become a Final
Maintenance Guideline, and need not include a copy of the
full set of guidelines. Such redline or comparison shall
be made against the Final Guideline section(s) as they
exist at the time a ballot is proposed, and need not take
into consideration other ballots that may be proposed
subsequently, except as provided in Bylaw Section 2.3(j).<br>
<br>
Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this
thread on the Public list. A vote in favor of the motion
must indicate a clear 'yes' in the response. A vote
against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote
to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the
response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The
latest vote received from any representative of a voting
member before the close of the voting period will be
counted. Voting members are listed here:
<a href="https://cabforum.org/members/"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://cabforum.org/members/</a><br>
<br>
In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more
of the votes cast by members in the CA category and
greater than 50% of the votes cast by members in the
browser category must be in favor. Quorum is shown on
CA/Browser Forum wiki. Under Bylaw 2.2(g), at least the
required quorum number must participate in the ballot for
the ballot to be valid, either by voting in favor, voting
against, or abstaining. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Public@cabforum.org">Public@cabforum.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public">https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Chris Kemmerer
Manager of Operations
SSL.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~ To find the reefs, look~~~~~~~~
~~~~ for the wrecks. ~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</pre>
</body>
</html>