<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>With passage of Ballot 190, I have created a new version 1.5.2 of the Baseline Requirements, which I’ll post shortly to the Forum website. However, we’ve noticed in creating this version 1.5.2 that Ballot 190 was drafted before passage of Ballot 204, which removed “or Delegated Third Party” from section 3.2.2.4. Ballot 190 inadvertently added “or Delegated Third Party” back into the Baseline Requirements. So Rich Smith, Tim Hollebeek and I are going to propose an errata ballot to re-remove “or Delegated Third Party” from section 3.2.2.4, unless everyone thinks that the intent of Ballot 204 should supersede the contradictory language in Ballot 190.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:2.0pt'><b><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#0174C3'>Ben Wilson, JD, CISA, CISSP<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:2.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#686869'>VP Compliance<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:2.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#686869'>+1 801 701 9678<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><img width=133 height=29 style='width:1.3875in;height:.3in' id="Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image001.jpg@01D332BB.37D90900"><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>