<div style="font:14px/1.5 'Lucida Grande', '微软雅黑';color:#333;"><p style="line-height: 1.5; font-family: 'Lucida Grande'; margin: 0px;">GDCA will endorse Ballot 211.</p><p style="line-height: 1.5; font-family: 'Lucida Grande'; margin: 0px;">However, we found a possible typo in 4.10.4 d), shouldn’t “destruction” be “migration”?</p><p style="line-height: 1.5; font-family: 'Lucida Grande'; margin: 0px;"><br></p><p style="line-height: 1.5; font-family: 'Lucida Grande'; margin: 0px;">Thanks!</p><p style="line-height: 1.5; font-family: 'Lucida Grande'; margin: 0px;"><br></p><p style="line-height: 1.5; font-family: 'Lucida Grande'; margin: 0px;">Yongqiang ZHANG</p><span style="font: 14px/1.5 'Lucida Grande';color:#333;"><br></span><div class="foxmail_blockquote_fromhere_element" style="font: 12px/1.5 'Lucida Grande';padding:2px 0 2px 0;"><span style="color:#333;text-decoration:line-through;white-space:pre-wrap;"> </span> 原始邮件 <span style="color:#333;text-decoration:line-through;white-space:pre-wrap;"> </span></div><div style="font: 12px/1.5 'Lucida Grande';background:#efefef;color:#666666;padding:8px;"><div><b style="color:#999;">发件人:</b> Kirk Hall via Public<public@cabforum.org></div><div><b style="color:#999;">收件人:</b> CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List<public@cabforum.org></div><div><b style="color:#999;">发送时间:</b> 2017年8月4日(周五) 04:45</div><div><b style="color:#999;">主题:</b> [cabfpub] Need two endorsers for Ballot 211 - Resolution ofApproval for WTCA v2.1 Changes</div></div><br><div class="mail_quote_9142F7E531CE4D3F943F95C505D33453" style="font: 14px/1.5 'Lucida Grande';color:#333;">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
.mail_quote_9142F7E531CE4D3F943F95C505D33453 p.MsoNormal,.mail_quote_9142F7E531CE4D3F943F95C505D33453 li.MsoNormal,.mail_quote_9142F7E531CE4D3F943F95C505D33453 div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
.mail_quote_9142F7E531CE4D3F943F95C505D33453 a:link,.mail_quote_9142F7E531CE4D3F943F95C505D33453 span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
.mail_quote_9142F7E531CE4D3F943F95C505D33453 a:visited,.mail_quote_9142F7E531CE4D3F943F95C505D33453 span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
.mail_quote_9142F7E531CE4D3F943F95C505D33453 span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.mail_quote_9142F7E531CE4D3F943F95C505D33453 p.line862,.mail_quote_9142F7E531CE4D3F943F95C505D33453 li.line862,.mail_quote_9142F7E531CE4D3F943F95C505D33453 div.line862
{mso-style-name:line862;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
.mail_quote_9142F7E531CE4D3F943F95C505D33453 .MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
.mail_quote_9142F7E531CE4D3F943F95C505D33453 div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Per our discussion on the CA/Browser Forum teleconference today, here is Ballot 211. Are there two endorsers for this?
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>BALLOT 211 </b>– <strong><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black;background:white">Resolution of Approval for WTCA v2.1 Changes</span></strong><strong><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black;background:white;font-weight:normal">
</span></strong><b><o:p></o:p></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><u>Type of Ballot</u></b>: Resolution of Approval of Forum Members only, and not a
<span style="color:black;background:white">Draft Guideline Ballot or Final Maintenance Guideline Ballot</span>.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black;background:white"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The following motion has been proposed by Kirk Hall of Entrust Datacard and endorsed by the following CA/B Forum member representatives: XXXX and YYYY to introduce a Resolution of Approval for WebTrust for CAs v2.1 Changes, as described
in the Ballot.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><u>Purpose of Ballot</u></b>: The WebTrust Task Force (TF) is ready to adopt changes to WebTrust for CAs Sec. 4.5 on CA key archival and destruction and new sections 4.9 and 4.10 on CA key transportation and CA key migration, as it has
been seeing a number of open questions in those areas. However the Task Force does not ordinarily create draft requirements, but instead typically relies on requirements from other credible sources (such as ISO 21188 for the original WebTrust for CAs in 2000)
and then creates related audit criteria. The Task Force has not asked the Forum to add the Sec. 4.5-4.10 changes to the Baseline Requirements or adopt them in a new formal Forum requirements document, but would like the Forum to formally approve the new audit
criteria in a Forum Ballot. This Ballot was drafted in response.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><b><span lang="EN" style="color:black">--Motion Begins--</span></b><span lang="EN" style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL<o:p></o:p></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The Members of the CA/Browser Forum have reviewed the proposed changes to the language of Section 4.5 and the new language of Sections 4.9 and 4.10 in the draft Trust Service Principles and Criteria for Certification Authorities (also known
as WebTrust for CAs) version 2.1, and hereby APPROVE the changes and new language and recommend that they be ADOPTED by the WebTrust Task Force (as the language in these sections may be changed from time to time by the WebTrust Task Force in the future, in
the Task Force’s sole discretion) in the final version of WebTrust for CAs version 2.1 and subsequent versions.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>--Motion Ends--<o:p></o:p></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="line862" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">BALLOT 211 –
<strong><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black;background:white;font-weight:normal">Resolution of Approval for WTCA v2.1 Changes</span></strong><strong><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black;background:white">
</span></strong><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="line862" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="line862" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Start time (22:00 UTC)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="line862" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">End time (22:00 UTC)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="line862" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="line862" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Discussion (7 to 14 calendar days)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="line862" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">[date]<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="line862" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">[date]<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="line862" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="line862" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Vote for approval (7 calendar days)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="line862" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">[date]<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="line862" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">[date]<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="line862" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="line862" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">If vote approves ballot: Review Period – Not applicable.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div></div>