<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p> </p>
<div class="moz-text-html" lang="x-unicode">
<div class="WordSection1"><o:p></o:p>We seem to have come full
circle to see that the limited-scope removal of 3.2.2.4 and
3.2.2.5 from DTPs is the right move. Here's an updated draft,
which takes Ryan's suggestion of dealing with Enterprise RAs by
saying that the CA has to do 3.2.2.4, or confirm the FQDN is
within the Domain Namespace of an FQDN which has been validated
using 3.2.2.4. Ryan commented:<br>
<br>
"It changes the relationship from permitting an Enterprise RA to
have unconstrained issuance, but contractual restriction, to
being one of technical restriction, by requiring that for every
FQDN, the CA validate it is within the Domain Namespace of a
(potentially previously) validated FQDN."<br>
<br>
I presume a CA could do this either by technical controls in the
certificate if the cert were under customer control, or
procedural controls on issuance if the cert were under the CA's
control.<br>
<br>
3.2.2.4.8 (IP address) is exempted, as per the follow-on
discussion.<br>
<br>
Can I get a couple of endorsers?<br>
<br>
Gerv<br>
<br>
<b>Ballot XXX - Forbid DTPs from doing Domain/IP Ownership
Validation<br>
</b>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal">
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal">
<b>Purpose of Ballot: </b>At the moment, CAs are permitted to
delegate the process of domain and IP address validation.
However, permitting such delegations is problematic due to the
way audits work - the auditing of such work may or may not be
required and, if it is, those audit documents may not make it
back to root programs for consideration. Although the audit
situation also needs fixing, domain validation is an important
enough component of a CA's core competencies that it seems
wiser to remove it from the larger problem and forbid its
delegation. The purpose of this ballot is to ensure that CAs
or their Affiliates are always the ones performing domain/IP
address ownership validation for certificates that CA is
responsible for.<br>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal">The
following motion has been proposed by Gervase Markham of
Mozilla and endorsed by XXX of XXX and XXX of XXX:<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal">
-- MOTION BEGINS -- <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal">
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre wrap="">1) In section 1.3.2 of the Baseline Requirements, replace the following sentence:
"The CA MAY delegate the performance of all, or any part, of Section 3.2 requirements to a Delegated Third Party, provided that the process as a whole fulfills all of the requirements of Section 3.2."
with:
"With the exception of sections 3.2.2.4 and 3.2.2.5, the CA MAY delegate the performance of all, or any part, of Section 3.2 requirements to a Delegated Third Party, provided that the process as a whole fulfills all of the requirements of Section 3.2."
2) In sections 3.2.2.4, replace the paragraph beginning "The CA SHALL confirm that" with the following:
"The CA SHALL confirm that, as of the date the Certificate issues, the CA has validated each Fully‐Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) listed in the Certificate using at least one of the methods listed below, or is within the Domain Namespace of a Fully-Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) that has been validated using at least one of the methods listed below (not including the method defined in section 3.2.2.4.8)."
3) In section 3.2.2.4.6, remove the words "or Delegated Third Party".
4) In section 3.2.2.4.11 (if still present in the text at the time the ballot passes), replace the following text:
"either the CA or a Delegated Third Party"
with:
"the CA"
5) In section 8.4, remove the paragraph beginning: "If a Delegated Third Party is not currently audited...".
6) In section 8.4, replace the following text:
"If the CA is not using one of the above procedures and the Delegated Third Party is not an Enterprise RA, then"
with:
"For Delegated Third Parties which are not Enterprise RAs, ".
</pre>
-- MOTION ENDS --<o:p></o:p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;text-autospace:none"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="line874" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">The procedure
for approval of this Final Maintenance Guideline ballot is
as follows (exact start and end times may be adjusted to
comply with applicable Bylaws and IPR Agreement):</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="line874" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" style="border-collapse:collapse"
cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width:229.25pt;border:solid windowtext
1.0pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt" valign="top"
width="306">
<p class="line874"
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:105%"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;line-height:105%;font-family:Calibri">BALLOT XXX</span></p>
<p class="line874"
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:105%"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;line-height:105%;font-family:Calibri">Status:
Final Maintenance Guideline</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
<td style="width:82.4pt;border:solid windowtext
1.0pt;border-left:none;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt"
valign="top" width="110">
<p class="line874"
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:center;line-height:105%"
align="center"> <span
style="font-size:11.0pt;line-height:105%;font-family:Calibri">Start
time (23:00 UTC)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
<td style="width:79.35pt;border:solid windowtext
1.0pt;border-left:none;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt"
valign="top" width="106">
<p class="line874"
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:center;line-height:105%"
align="center"> <span
style="font-size:11.0pt;line-height:105%;font-family:Calibri">End
time (23:00 UTC)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:229.25pt;border:solid windowtext
1.0pt;border-top:none;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt"
valign="top" width="306">
<p class="line874"
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:105%"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;line-height:105%;font-family:Calibri">Discussion
(7 to 14 days)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
<td
style="width:82.4pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid
windowtext 1.0pt;border-right:solid windowtext
1.0pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt" valign="top"
width="110">
<p class="line874"
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:center;line-height:105%"
align="center"> <span
style="font-size:11.0pt;line-height:105%;font-family:Calibri">XXX</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
<td
style="width:79.35pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid
windowtext 1.0pt;border-right:solid windowtext
1.0pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt" valign="top"
width="106">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="text-align:center;line-height:105%"
align="center">XXX<o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:229.25pt;border:solid windowtext
1.0pt;border-top:none;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt"
valign="top" width="306">
<p class="line874"
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:105%"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;line-height:105%;font-family:Calibri">Vote for
approval (7 days)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
<td
style="width:82.4pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid
windowtext 1.0pt;border-right:solid windowtext
1.0pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt" valign="top"
width="110">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="text-align:center;line-height:105%"
align="center">XXX<o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
<td
style="width:79.35pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid
windowtext 1.0pt;border-right:solid windowtext
1.0pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt" valign="top"
width="106">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="text-align:center;line-height:105%"
align="center">XXX<o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:229.25pt;border:solid windowtext
1.0pt;border-top:none;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt"
valign="top" width="306">
<p class="line874"
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:105%"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;line-height:105%;font-family:Calibri">If vote
approves ballot: Review Period (Chair to send Review
Notice) (30 days). </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="line874"
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:105%"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;line-height:105%;font-family:Calibri">If
Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is
rescinded and PAG to be created.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="line874"
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:105%"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;line-height:105%;font-family:Calibri">If no
Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes effective at
end of Review Period.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
<td
style="width:82.4pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid
windowtext 1.0pt;border-right:solid windowtext
1.0pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt" valign="top"
width="110">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="text-align:center;line-height:105%"
align="center">Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair<o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
<td
style="width:79.35pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid
windowtext 1.0pt;border-right:solid windowtext
1.0pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt" valign="top"
width="106">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="text-align:center;line-height:105%"
align="center">30 days after filing of Review Notice
by Chair<o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="line874" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="line874" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">From Bylaw 2.3:
If the Draft Guideline Ballot is proposing a Final
Maintenance Guideline, such ballot will include a redline or
comparison showing the set of changes from the Final
Guideline section(s) intended to become a Final Maintenance
Guideline, and need not include a copy of the full set of
guidelines. Such redline or comparison shall be made
against the Final Guideline section(s) as they exist at the
time a ballot is proposed, and need not take into
consideration other ballots that may be proposed
subsequently, except as provided in Bylaw Section 2.3(j).</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="line874" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="line862" style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri;">Votes must be
cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the
Public list. A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a
clear 'yes' in the response. A vote against must indicate a
clear 'no' in the response. A vote to abstain must indicate
a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will
not be counted. The latest vote received from any
representative of a voting member before the close of the
voting period will be counted. Voting members are listed
here: </span><font color="#000000"><a
href="https://cabforum.org/members/"><span
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri;">https://cabforum.org/members/</span></a></font><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;color:windowtext"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In order for the motion to be adopted, two
thirds or more of the votes cast by members in the CA category
and greater than 50% of the votes cast by members in the
browser category must be in favor. <span
style="background:white">Quorum is shown on CA/Browser Forum
wiki. Under Bylaw 2.2(g), at least the required quorum
number must participate in the ballot for the ballot to be
valid, either by voting in favor, voting against, or
abstaining.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>