<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font face="Cambria">Indeed, Richard, but unfortunately what used to
be a single step (audit) now needs two steps - the TSPs need to
meet also the [non-existing] supervisor requirements.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
M.D. </font><br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/29/2016 1:05 AM, tScheme
Technical Manager wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:2aff01d249cb$fae9c9e0$f0bd5da0$@trevorah@tScheme.org"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Cambria;
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Technically,
eIDAS gave July 2016 as the cutoff but allowed one year for
transition. However, it states that any audits after July
2016 must use new requirements.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Cheers<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Richard<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">------------------------------------<br>
Richard Trevorah<br>
Technical Manager<br>
tScheme Limited<br>
<br>
M: +44 (0) 781 809 4728<br>
F: +44 (0) 870 005 6311<br>
<br>
</span><span style="color:#1F497D"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.tscheme.org" target="_blank">http://www.tscheme.org</a><br>
</span>------------------------------------<br>
<br>
The information in this message and, if present, any
attachments are intended solely for the attention and use of
the named addressee(s). The content of this e-mail and its
attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged.
Unless otherwise stated, any use or disclosure is unauthorised
and may be unlawful.<br>
<br>
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the
message and any attachments and notify the sender as soon as
practicable<span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"
lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"
lang="EN-US"> Public
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org">mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Moudrick
M. Dadashov via Public<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 28 November 2016 22:59<br>
<b>To:</b> CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Moudrick M. Dadashov<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cabfpub] When to stop accepting old
ETSI audits?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-family:"Cambria","serif"">Yes,
July 2017 is reasonable - the new ones require extra
bureaucracy with the supervisors.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
M.D. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 11/28/2016 3:44 PM, Gervase Markham
via Public wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<pre>Dear CAB Forum members,<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre>Ballot 171, passed on 1st July 2016, updated the BRs to remove the old<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>ETSI criteria (ETSI TS 101 456 V1.4.3 or ETSI TS 102 042 V2.3.1) and add<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>the new ones (ETSI EN 319 411-1 v1.1.1 or ETSI EN 319 411-2 v2.1.1).<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>This change was made in BRs v.1.3.6. However, no dates were associated<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>with the change.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre>Mozilla CA Policy 2.3 (about to be published) permits either set of<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>criteria to be used.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre>By what date would it be reasonable for Mozilla to require that all new<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>ETSI audits use the new criteria?<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre>Inigo says that eIDAS (which, of course, refers only to the issuance of<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Qualified certificates) have specified July 2017 as the end date for the<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>old criteria. Would that be a reasonable choice?<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre>Gerv<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Public mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Public@cabforum.org">Public@cabforum.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public">https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>