<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hi Arkadiusz,<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/23/2015 01:07 PM,
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:arkadiusz.lawniczak@unizeto.pl">arkadiusz.lawniczak@unizeto.pl</a> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:OFD5A00AE4.4DE886AA-ONC1257EE7.00377A33-C1257EE7.0037975F@unizeto.pl"
type="cite"><font face="sans-serif" size="2">EV Code Signing
Guidelines establishes
the need of additional identification of subscribers by
permanentIdentidentifier
extension.</font>
<br>
<font face="sans-serif" size="2">Taking into account RFC 4043 and
the
various combinations of fields in permanentIdentidentifier, do
you know
is assigner field in permanentIdentidentifier required? I mean,
if we accept
permanentIdentidentifier as globally unique or localy unique
identifier.
</font>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Thank you for your input. I'll forward this item to our public list
and we urge you to follow the discussion there by either subscribing
or viewing our archive at this link:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public">https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public</a><br>
<br>
Colleagues, who can propose an answer to this question, is the
question clear?<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Regards </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Signer: </td>
<td>Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td><a href="http://www.startcom.org">StartCom Ltd.</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XMPP: </td>
<td><a href="xmpp:startcom@startcom.org">startcom@startcom.org</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blog: </td>
<td><a href="http://blog.startcom.org">Join the Revolution!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Twitter: </td>
<td><a href="http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg">Follow Me</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>