<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Also - a point of order on this, but I thought all ballots needed one telephone call or face to face before they could be started? Did that change?
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></a></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> public-bounces@cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Rick Andrews<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, October 2, 2015 3:07 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Ryan Sleevi<br>
<b>Cc:</b> public@cabforum.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 152 - Issuance of SHA-1 certificates through 2016<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I apologize; I messed up the dates. I meant to start both periods on a Monday, so review starting Monday Oct 5 and ballot starting the following Monday. <br>
<br>
The goal is to allow CAs to issue SHA-1 certs through 2016, for browser-mediated connections and other internal or external TLS connections. The current BRs prohibit us from issuing SHA-1 certs in 2016 for any purpose from public roots. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
-Rick<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
On Oct 2, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Ryan Sleevi <<a href="mailto:sleevi@google.com">sleevi@google.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Rick Andrews <<a href="mailto:Rick_Andrews@symantec.com" target="_blank">Rick_Andrews@symantec.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<p><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">The review period for this ballot shall commence at 2200 UTC on Monday,</span>
<span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">October 2, 2015, and will close at 2200 UTC on Monday,</span>
<span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">October</span> <span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">
9, 2015. Unless the motion is withdrawn during the review period, the voting period will start immediately thereafter and will close at 2200 UTC on Monday,</span>
<span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">October</span> <span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">
16, 2015. Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Rick, it would appear either the days or the dates are wrong for this ballot. October 2, 2015 is a Friday, as is October 16.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Am I correct in assuming that the review period begins today, Friday, October 2, 2015, and continues to Friday, October 9, 2015. Voting then concludes on Friday, October 16, 2015?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Can you also indicate whether the goal of such a ballot is to support browser-mediated connections to servers, or is this to enable internal systems outside of browser use cases?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>