<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/05/2015 04:26 PM, Gervase Markham
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:54D37D9F.1070907@mozilla.org" type="cite">I'm
not the person who argued for a restriction on *.facebook.com EV<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I too might be wrong on this, but according to my memory I recall
that you were the person arguing against it when we discussed it
last time when we created the BR. :-)<br>
<br>
IIRC Wayne from Godaddy argued (correctly) that if wild cards should
be restricted it would make most sense to have it supported by EV
since it's the strongest verification standard currently. EV allows
to include domain names of third parties (in my opinion
incorrectly), so adding wild cards doesn't change that in any way
really.<br>
<br>
We would be in favor for such a move and believe that wild cards
have nothing lost in the non-verified (e.g. DV) settings due to
their potential abuse. If at all, wild cards should be permitted
with EV and prohibited for DV (if you want anything else than EV).<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Regards </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Signer: </td>
<td>Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td><a href="http://www.startcom.org">StartCom Ltd.</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XMPP: </td>
<td><a href="xmpp:startcom@startcom.org">startcom@startcom.org</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blog: </td>
<td><a href="http://blog.startcom.org">Join the Revolution!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Twitter: </td>
<td><a href="http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg">Follow Me</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>