<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Gerv, you have two endorsers now.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
M.D.<br>
<br>
P.S. As we discussed with Robin and Ben in Berlin, we should focus
more on pragmatic aspects of Business continuity, Termination
requirements in order to "compensate this lost". <br>
<br>
On 11/25/2014 6:52 PM, Ryan Sleevi wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CACvaWvbu0ZcvPkMCEeWtDxSLoDcZSsQTaeUpXVjd1sOCJ4Y80Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">Happy to endorse.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Nov 25, 2014 5:50 PM, "Gervase
Markham" <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gerv@mozilla.org">gerv@mozilla.org</a>> wrote:<br
type="attribution">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Following on
from discussions at the last face-to-face and the failure<br>
of the previous ballot relating to insurance, this is a
pre-ballot for<br>
discussion of an alternative pathway. However, I suspect that
the amount<br>
of heated discussion already on this topic means that there is
very<br>
little new to say. :-)<br>
<br>
I would only repeat that I consulted Mozilla's legal team and
we<br>
concluded that the particular insurance requirements currently
specified<br>
did not have any beneficial effect in any plausible scenario.
Therefore,<br>
any money spent on them which (would not otherwise have been
spent to<br>
meet other requirements a CA has) is wasted. We also think it
is would<br>
not be reasonable for a CA to export across the industry costs
imposed<br>
upon them by their jurisdiction or choice of business areas.
That is to<br>
say, just because some CAs are required by other parties to
have<br>
insurance does not mean the CAB Forum should require it.<br>
<br>
Gerv<br>
<br>
<br>
Pre-Ballot XXX - Removal of Insurance Requirements<br>
<br>
Gervase Markham of Mozilla made the following motion and XXX
of XXX and<br>
YYY of YYY have endorsed it:<br>
<br>
---MOTION BEGINS---<br>
<br>
Remove section 8.4 from the EV Guidelines, and renumber other
sections<br>
appropriately.<br>
<br>
---MOTION ENDS---<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Public mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Public@cabforum.org">Public@cabforum.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public"
target="_blank">https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Public@cabforum.org">Public@cabforum.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public">https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>