<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Would you mind to post a consolidated
update so that we all reply to that single email?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
M.D. <br>
<br>
On 9/4/2014 11:10 PM, Ben Wilson wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:76156f3583a74681a48f93598231463d@EX2.corp.digicert.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Cambria;
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:8.0pt;
margin-left:0in;
line-height:normal;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Cambria","serif";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:.1in;
margin-left:0in;
line-height:120%;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
line-height:normal;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
p.line874, li.line874, div.line874
{mso-style-name:line874;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
line-height:normal;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
p.line862, li.line862, div.line862
{mso-style-name:line862;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
line-height:normal;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">An
additional change is needed to section 11.9.2, as I
understand it. My previous email referred to a change to
11.9.2(2), but a modification really needs to be made in
section 11.9.2 (1) as well to replace “phone number, as
verified in accordance with these Guidelines.” Replacing
that language in section 11.9.2(1), it would read, <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:12.25pt;margin-left:.25in;text-indent:-.25in;line-height:normal">(1)
<s>A phone call to</s> <u>Contacting</u> the Applicant<s>’s
or Agent’s phone number, as verified in accordance with
these Guidelines</s> <u>using a Verified Method of
Communication for the Applicant</u>, <u>for the attention
of</u> <s>asking to speak to</s> the Certificate Requester
or Contract Signer, as applicable, followed by a response from
someone who identifies themselves as such person confirming
that he/she did sign the applicable document on behalf of the
Applicant<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">So
that section 11.9.2(1) be amended to read, "Contacting the
Applicant using a Verified Method of Communication for the
Applicant, for the attention of the Certificate Requester or
Contract Signer, as applicable, followed by a response from
someone who identifies themselves as such person confirming
that he/she did sign the applicable document on behalf of
the Applicant.”<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span
style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span
style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org">public-bounces@cabforum.org</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org">mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Ben
Wilson<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, September 4, 2014 11:50 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> '<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:public@cabforum.org">public@cabforum.org</a>'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 131 - Update to
Verified Method of Communication<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">All,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Mads
Henriksveen of Buypass has identified a mistake in the
language of Ballot 131. Apparently the drafters only
intended to replace references to telephone number/mailing
address in sections 11.8.2, 11.9.2 and 11.10.2 (and not
those entire sections). The believe that everyone who voted
in favor thus far had that same understanding about this
ballot, so they have asked me to update the ballot based on
this correction and to republish the redlined version. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I’d
like everyone to re-vote on Ballot 131 with the following
three changes in mind, and I’ll hold Ballot 131 open for an
additional few days. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Sections
9, 10, and 11 should have read: <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">9.
REPLACE newly renumbered subsection 11.8.2(2)(A) with " (A)
Contacting the Applicant using a Verified Method of
Communication for the Applicant, and obtaining confirmation
that the Contract Signer and/or the Certificate Approver, as
applicable, is an employee; or”<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">10.
REPLACE newly renumbered subsection 11.9.2(1) with "A letter
mailed to the Applicant’s or Agent’s address, as verified
through independent means in accordance with these
Guidelines, for the attention of the Certificate Requester
or Contract Signer, as applicable, followed by a response
through a Verified Method of Communication from someone who
identifies themselves as such person confirming that he/she
did sign the applicable document on behalf of the Applicant”<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">11.
REPLACE newly renumbered subsection 11.10.2 (1) with
"Contacting the Certificate Approver using a Verified Method
of Communication for the Applicant and obtaining oral or
written confirmation that the Certificate Approver has
reviewed and approved the EV Certificate Request;”<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">The
previous redlined version also didn’t include changes under
paragraph 6 of the ballot for section 11.11.4(1)(A)(i). See
the attached redlined version which should have all of those
changes marked as intended, along with the punctuation
consistency for sections 11.8.2, 11.9.2, and 11.10.2, as
recommended by Wayne.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Thanks,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Ben<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span
style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span
style="font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org">public-bounces@cabforum.org</a>
[<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org">mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Jeremy Rowley<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, August 22, 2014 10:51 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> '<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:public@cabforum.org">public@cabforum.org</a>'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [cabfpub] Ballot 131 - Update to
Verified Method of Communication<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">Hi everyone, <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">The following is a
revised ballot for verifying a method of communication from
the EV working group. The changes in this ballot incorporate
the comments provide during the face-to-face and on the
mailing list. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">Jeremy<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">------------------
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">Ballot 131 -
Update to Verified Method of Communication<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">The EV Guidelines
Working Group has revisited Section 11.4 of the EV
Guidelines (Applicant’s Physical Existence) and has decided
that it is best to split it into two separate sections.
Section 11.4.1 would remain as is for "Address of
Applicant’s Place of Business." Section 11.4.2 would be
moved to its own section--a new 11.5, and all subsequent
section numbers in 11 would be renumbered accordingly. The
new Section 11.5 will focus on a verified means for
communicating with the organization to be named as the
subject in the certificate (to verify the authority of EV
roles and ensure that it was appropriately aware of the
certificate request).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">Cecilia Kam of
Symantec made the following motion, and Rich Smith from
Comodo and Jeremy Rowley from DigiCert have endorsed it.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext
1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">Motion Begins <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">In the Guidelines
for the Issuance and Management of Extended Validation
Certificates:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">1. DELETE Section
11.4.2 (Telephone Number for Applicant's Place of Business)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">2. INSERT a new
definition - "Verified Method of Communication" - in Section
4 as follows:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">Verified Method of
Communication: The use of a telephone number, a fax number,
an email address, or a postal delivery address, confirmed by
the CA in accordance with Section 11.5 of the Guidelines as
a reliable way of communicating with the Applicant.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">3. In Section
11.11.1, renumber the existing subsection (3) as subsection
(4) and INSERT a new subsection (3) as follows:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">"(3) Verify a
reliable means of communication with the entity to be named
as the Subject in the Certificate;" <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">4. RENUMBER
sections 11.5 through 11.13 by increasing them each by .1
and UPDATE all cross-references in the EV Guidelines.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">5. INSERT a new
Section 11.5 titled, "Verified Method of Communication" as
follows:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">11.5 Verified
Method of Communication <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">11.5.1
Verification Requirements<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">To assist in
communicating with the Applicant and confirming that the
Applicant is aware of and approves issuance, the CA MUST
verify a telephone number, fax number, email address, or
postal delivery address as a Verified Method of
Communication with the Applicant.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">11.5.2 Acceptable
Methods of Verification<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">To verify a
Verified Method of Communication with the Applicant, the CA
MUST: <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">(A) Verify that
the Verified Method of Communication belongs to the
Applicant, or a Parent/Subsidiary or Affiliate of the
Applicant, by matching it with one of the Applicant’s
Parent/Subsidiary or Affiliate’s Places of Business in: (i)
records provided by the applicable phone company; (ii) a
QGIS, QTIS, or QIIS; or (iii) a Verified Legal Opinion or
Verified Accountant Letter; and <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">(B) Confirm the
Verified Method of Communication by using it to obtain an
affirmative response sufficient to enable a reasonable
person to conclude that the Applicant, or a
Parent/Subsidiary or Affiliate of Applicant, can be
contacted reliably by using the Verified Method of
Communication. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">6. Amend newly
renumbered subsection 11.11.4(1)(A)(i) as follows: "A
position within the Applicant’s organization that qualifies
as a Confirming Person (e.g., Secretary, President, CEO,
CFO, COO, CIO, CSO, Director, etc.) and is identified by
name and title in a current QGIS, QIIS, QTIS, Verified Legal
Opinion, Verified Accountant Letter, or by contacting the
Applicant’s using a Verified Method of Communication; or"<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">7. REPLACE newly
renumbered subsection 11.14.1(1) (D) with "(D) Verified
Method of Communication – thirteen months " <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">8. REPLACE newly
renumbered subsection 11.14.3(1)(C) with "The Verified
Method of Communication required by Section 11.4.2 but still
MUST perform the verification required by Section
11.4.2(2)(B);" <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">9. REPLACE newly
renumbered subsection 11.8.2(2)(A) with "The Verified Method
of Communication"<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">10. REPLACE newly
renumbered subsection 11.9.2(1) with "The Verified Method of
Communication"<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">11. REPLACE newly
renumbered subsection 11.10.2 (1) with "The Verified Method
of Communication"<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext
1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">
<p class="line874"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Cambria","serif"">Motion
Ends <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="line874"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Cambria","serif"">The
review period for this ballot shall commence at 2200 UTC on
Friday, 22 August 2014, and will close at 2200 UTC on
Friday, 29 August 2014. Unless the motion is withdrawn
during the review period, the voting period will start
immediately thereafter and will close at 2200 UTC on Friday,
5 September 2014. Votes must be cast by posting an on-list
reply to this thread. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="line862"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Cambria","serif"">A
vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in
the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in
the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear
'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will not be
counted. The latest vote received from any representative of
a voting member before the close of the voting period will
be counted. Voting members are listed here: <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://cabforum.org/members/">https://cabforum.org/members/</a>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="line874"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Cambria","serif"">In
order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of
the votes cast by members in the CA category and greater
than 50% of the votes cast by members in the browser
category must be in favor. Also, at least seven members must
participate in the ballot, either by voting in favor, voting
against, or abstaining. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Public@cabforum.org">Public@cabforum.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public">https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>