<div dir="ltr">Correct. But that should only affects names that were already on the SLD Block list - this just clarifies if it goes through the Alternate Path for registration, which is and was already onerous in and of itself.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Bruce Morton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bruce.morton@entrust.com" target="_blank">bruce.morton@entrust.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">It would be great if some CAs could provide their experience, but I have seen that a registry that is in production will not register a domain name until the
collision management period is over.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> Ryan Sleevi [mailto:<a href="mailto:sleevi@google.com" target="_blank">sleevi@google.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, August 21, 2014 12:36 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Bruce Morton<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Stephen Davidson; CABFPub</span></p><div><div class="h5"><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cabfpub] FW: [cabfman] ICANN Changes relating to gTLDs<u></u><u></u></div></div><p></p><div><div class="h5">
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">This doesn't change the timing at all. Current gTLDs are limited for when they can accept registrations - based on our own previously agreed timelines with ICANN.<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">This just clarifies that in the period until then, the names be made resolvable to the sentinel IP, as a way of signalling to users who WILL BE affected by this delegation will receive some awareness (e.g. assuming they're not subscribed
to GTLD announcements)<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Bruce Morton <<a href="mailto:bruce.morton@entrust.com" target="_blank">bruce.morton@entrust.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">This attempt at collision occurrence management appears to throw another delay into the time period
a domain user can register a domain. Is there any discussion in extending or changing the 120 day gTLD rule?</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Thanks, Bruce.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">
<a href="mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org" target="_blank">public-bounces@cabforum.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org" target="_blank">public-bounces@cabforum.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Ryan Sleevi<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, August 21, 2014 12:16 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Stephen Davidson<br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:public@cabforum.org" target="_blank">public@cabforum.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cabfpub] FW: [cabfman] ICANN Changes relating to gTLDs</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Stephen,<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Just to clarify: New TLDs are required to do controlled interruptions at the <TLD> level for 90 days. So all new TLDs should be sending to the signal IP (127.0.53.53)<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">The second level list is an existing concept - the SLD Block List - and it requires that *existing* TLDs take these second level through the controlled interruption period too.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I just wanted to highlight that it's just just second-level domains getting interrupted - the TLDs will be interrupted as well.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Stephen Davidson <<a href="mailto:S.Davidson@quovadisglobal.com" target="_blank">S.Davidson@quovadisglobal.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Hi Ryan – sure.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Best, Stephen</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:<a href="mailto:sleevi@google.com" target="_blank">sleevi@google.com</a>]
<br>
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 12:34 PM<br>
To: Stephen Davidson<br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:management@cabforum.org" target="_blank">management@cabforum.org</a><br>
Subject: Re: [cabfman] ICANN Changes relating to gTLDs</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">I'd be happy to respond to this on the public list.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Stephen Davidson <<a href="mailto:S.Davidson@quovadisglobal.com" target="_blank">S.Davidson@quovadisglobal.com</a>>
wrote:</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">FYI: ICANN recently changed the rules in a way that may affect customers who wish to register new
gTLD domains to “legitimize” their previous use of internal server names in SSL.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><a href="https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-new-gtld-2014-07-30-en" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-new-gtld-2014-07-30-en</a></span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><a href="http://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/agreements/name-collision-assessment-04aug14-en.htm" target="_blank">http://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/agreements/name-collision-assessment-04aug14-en.htm</a>
</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">In summary: each gTLD has a list of second level domains which ICANN has determined are potential
name collisions. ICANN has updated the requirements for Registries, requiring them to implement 90-day "controlled interruption" as the notification measure to alert parties that they may be leaking queries intended from private namespaces to the public DNS
(second link above).</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Best, Stephen</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Management mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Management@cabforum.org" target="_blank">Management@cabforum.org</a><br>
<a href="https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/management" target="_blank">https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/management</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>