<div dir="ltr">I utterly agree with the new wording and requirements.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr"><span style="color:rgb(136,136,136)">-- </span><br style="color:rgb(136,136,136)"><div dir="ltr">
<font color="#999999" style="color:rgb(136,136,136)"><b>Chema López</b></font><div><font color="#999999"><b>Gestor de Proyectos - Departamento Técnico</b></font></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136)"><font color="#999999"><b>AC Firmaprofesional, S.A.</b></font><br>
</div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136)"><br></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136)"><font color="#999999">Edificio ESADECREAPOLIS - 1B13</font></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136)"><font color="#999999">08173 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona. </font></div>
<div style="color:rgb(136,136,136)"><font color="#999999">T. 934 774 245</font></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136)"><font color="#999999">M. 666 429 224</font></div><div style="color:rgb(136,136,136)"></div></div></div>
</div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Ben Wilson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ben@digicert.com" target="_blank">ben@digicert.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div><p class="MsoNormal">Here is a draft ballot that would reduce and simplify the insurance requirements in section 8.4 of the EV Guidelines. It would:<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">
<u></u> <u></u></p><p><u></u><span>1-<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span><u></u>eliminate the $2 million commercial general liability insurance requirement and replace it with ordinary casualty insurance (in whatever amount would be sufficient to repair CA systems); <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p><u></u><span>2-<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span><u></u>replace third party coverage of $5 million US (nearly €3.7 million) with a €2 million amount (a 46% reduction); <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p><u></u><span>3-<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span><u></u>eliminate certain types of third party insurance that might be hard to obtain in various jurisdictions, such as professional liability, contractual liability, technology E&O, IP infringement, invasion of privacy, and advertising injury; <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p><u></u><span>4-<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span><u></u>increase the number of potential insurers that CAs can use (any rated "good" by any well-recognized insurance rating service); <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p><u></u><span>5-<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span><u></u>clarify that insurance must be global and cover the lifetimes of EV certificates issued; and <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p><u></u><span>6-<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span><u></u>only recommend that a CA obtain additional insurance for damage to data or systems due to IT security failure, if such is available to the CA at reasonable cost.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">I'm looking for additional comments and endorsers, and then I will add this to next week's agenda.<u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><u></u><u></u></font></span></p><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">Ben<u></u><u></u></p>
</font></span></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Public mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Public@cabforum.org">Public@cabforum.org</a><br>
<a href="https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public" target="_blank">https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>