<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Oops. Sorry, Iņigo. I stand corrected. I’m reposting it.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Thanks, Rich.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Ben <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Rich Smith [mailto:richard.smith@comodo.com] <br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 23, 2013 2:02 PM<br><b>To:</b> ben@digicert.com; public@cabforum.org<br><b>Subject:</b> RE: [cabfpub] Ballot 106 - Extended deadline to prohibit OCSP good response for non-issued certificates<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Point of order: I believe your inclusion of Inigo as an endorser is in error. Unless I missed some other response, his reply was a '+1' to Sigbjorn's reply and very much against this ballot.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>-Rich<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt'><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> <a href="mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org">public-bounces@cabforum.org</a> [<a href="mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org">mailto:public-bounces@cabforum.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Ben Wilson<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 23, 2013 12:44 PM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:public@cabforum.org">public@cabforum.org</a><br><b>Subject:</b> [cabfpub] Ballot 106 - Extended deadline to prohibit OCSP good response for non-issued certificates<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Ballot 106 – Extended Deadline to Prohibit OCSP “Good” Response for Non-Issued Certificates<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Given that several CAs have notified the CA/Browser Forum that they will be unable to comply with the 1-August-2013 deadline by which OCSP responders MUST NOT respond with a "good" status for unissued certificates, and that a one-year extension of this deadline is an appropriate timeframe by which these CAs should be able to come into compliance;<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Kelvin Yiu made the following motion, and Eddy Nigg from StartCom, Ryan Hurst from GlobalSign, and Iida Yosiaki from SECOM, and Inigo Barreira of Izenpe endorsed it: <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Motion Begins <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>EFFECTIVE RETROACTIVELY TO 1 AUGUST 2013,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The last sentence of Section 13.2.6 of the Baseline Requirements (Response for non-issued certificates) is hereby amended to read as follows: <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>“Effective 1 August 2014, OCSP responders MUST NOT respond with a "good" status for such certificates.”<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Motion Ends<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The ballot review period comes into effect immediately upon posting today (Tuesday, 23 July 2013) and will close at 2200 UTC on Tuesday, 30 July 2013. Unless the ballot is withdrawn or modified during the review period, the voting period will start immediately thereafter and will close at 2200 UTC on Tuesday, 6 August 2013. If the ballot is modified for reasons other than to correct minor typographical errors, then the ballot will be deemed to have been withdrawn.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>A vote in favor of the ballot must indicate a clear 'yes' in the response.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>A vote against the ballot must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period will be counted.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Voting members are listed here: <a href="http://www.cabforum.org/forum.html">http://www.cabforum.org/forum.html</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast by members in the CA category and more than one half of the votes cast by members in the browser category must be in favor. Also, quorum is currently set at seven (7) members-- at least seven members must participate in the ballot, either by voting in favor, voting against, or by abstaining for the vote to be valid.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></body></html>