<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
On 07/19/2013 07:41 PM, From Ben Wilson:
<blockquote cite="mid:017201ce849e$e3fc1210$abf43630$@digicert.com"
type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Should
we move the deadline from August 1 to January 1 and request
that any CA / OCSP software provider with a problem provide us
with a statement of progress, hurdles to overcome, and/or
proposed milestones, with a response deadline of October 15 .
Then, based on those responses received, if any, we determine
whether the deadline should be moved out further? <o:p></o:p></span>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">If
there is interest in this proposal, then we should create a
new ballot and we would need a sponsor and two endorsers.
Also, to the extent that the timing of the review and
voting periods would extend beyond August 1, we would have
to suspend the rules in order for voting to be completed
before August 1. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I would agree with both - e.g. split the ballots into two and the
January first deadline for OCSP. <br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Regards </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Signer: </td>
<td>Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td><a href="http://www.startcom.org">StartCom Ltd.</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XMPP: </td>
<td><a href="xmpp:startcom@startcom.org">startcom@startcom.org</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blog: </td>
<td><a href="http://blog.startcom.org">Join the Revolution!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Twitter: </td>
<td><a href="http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg">Follow Me</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<br>
</body>
</html>