<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
On 03/15/2013 10:27 PM, From Erwann ABALEA:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+i=0E4QsbeB+J7VtO5Pxjzf+8eS85koL+4ZRLgpPeVJROGSNQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I don't think the recent request to consider ".corp" as internal (and
reject the gTLD application) will receive a positive answer.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
They however closely use the same argumentation I've been using
during all discussions for the last few years including those
preceding the BR. And I'm not surprised really - when certificate
authorities confirm something that it hasn't verified and isn't able
to verify, it failed in its very basic tasks.<br>
<br>
We are on the right track with phasing them out and ICANN apparently
is willing to work with the CAB Forum, but my recommendation is to
stop this practice as soon as possible voluntarily.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Regards </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Signer: </td>
<td>Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td><a href="http://www.startcom.org">StartCom Ltd.</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XMPP: </td>
<td><a href="xmpp:startcom@startcom.org">startcom@startcom.org</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blog: </td>
<td><a href="http://blog.startcom.org">Join the Revolution!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Twitter: </td>
<td><a href="http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg">Follow Me</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<br>
</body>
</html>