<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
On 11/16/2012 11:36 PM, From Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.):
<blockquote cite="mid:50A6B1F3.5080706@startcom.org" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
As long as there are CAs that will sign just anything and
everything (for pay), what does it matter if there are revocation
capabilities?<br>
<br>
Don't make EV weaker than it is already, we have enough trouble
earning some credibility in the other settings, we don't need more
of that.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Having said that, even though I'm in disagreement with Gerv about
his perception regarding OV certificates, it's still troubling to
hear that there is still no confidence in the work and diligence
most of us probably do. <br>
<br>
If we can change this perception by raising the bar with serious and
reasonable improvements, we probably should do it. We certainly
should eliminate well known risk first.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Regards </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Signer: </td>
<td>Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td><a href="http://www.startcom.org">StartCom Ltd.</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XMPP: </td>
<td><a href="xmpp:startcom@startcom.org">startcom@startcom.org</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blog: </td>
<td><a href="http://blog.startcom.org">Join the Revolution!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Twitter: </td>
<td><a href="http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg">Follow Me</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>