Eddy, this is my subjective observation for quite a long period.<br><br>First, because of manageability, more people means more time, more efforts almost for everything. And second, If we know beforehand that we are reaching the point, we start thinking about, discussing that subject much earlier.<br><br>Reform proposals raising from forecasted facts are easy to discuss, agree and implement. So I thought a single sentence with proper wording might save us time and energy on 'self serving' issues like governance.<br><br>Thanks,<br>M.D.<br><br>"Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.)" <eddy_nigg@startcom.org> wrote:<br><br>
<br>
On 09/19/2012 02:05 AM, From Moudrick M. Dadashov:
<blockquote cite="mid:5058FE25.8080807@ssc.lt" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi Kirk,<br>
<br>
I think the proposed model should work quite well the way it did
so far but as (if) the number of members reaches some critical
point the Forum will need some reform again.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Can you explain why you think that there is a some "critical point"
and why it should matter?<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Regards </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Signer: </td>
<td>Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td><a href="http://www.startcom.org">StartCom Ltd.</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>XMPP: </td>
<td><a href="xmpp:startcom@startcom.org">startcom@startcom.org</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blog: </td>
<td><a href="http://blog.startcom.org">Join the Revolution!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Twitter: </td>
<td><a href="http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg">Follow Me</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<br>