<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Georgia;
panose-1:2 4 5 2 5 4 5 2 3 3;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Times New Roman \(Body CS\)";
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Georgia",serif;
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Georgia",serif'>Sounds good, Ryan! Dimitris, the link I provided is the official DOCX from the official master branch: that’s the 1.7.0 version of the current master-branch BRs. So that’s the current clean master version, against which you can compare something from the ballot outputs to create a binary redline. The trick is getting you something from the SC30/SC31 branches to create that redline against. </span><span style='font-family:"Apple Color Emoji"'>😊</span><span style='font-family:"Georgia",serif'> Ryan, I’ll have a look at it today when I have a chance as well and see if I can sort it. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Georgia",serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black'>-- <br>Jos Purvis (</span><a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com"><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Consolas;color:#954F72'>jopurvis@cisco.com</span></a><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black'>)<br>.:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services<br>PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and Trust Verification</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Georgia",serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Georgia",serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>From: </span></b><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com><br><b>Date: </b>Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:50 AM<br><b>To: </b>Dimitris Zacharopoulos <dzacharo@harica.gr><br><b>Cc: </b>"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" <jopurvis@cisco.com>, "infrastructure@cabforum.org" <infrastructure@cabforum.org><br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [Infrastructure] Preparation of review period for SC30 and SC31<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><a href="https://archive.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/2020-May/000223.html">https://archive.cabforum.org/pipermail/infrastructure/2020-May/000223.html</a> for the instructions<o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:48 AM Ryan Sleevi <<a href="mailto:sleevi@google.com">sleevi@google.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in'><div><p class=MsoNormal>Let me dig out the previous e-mail from our discussions about this.<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>The answer is "No, it won't work", and I was offering to get to it once I'm nearer to a computer that can do that.<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:43 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos <<a href="mailto:dzacharo@harica.gr" target="_blank">dzacharo@harica.gr</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in'><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>That's fine.<br><br>Do we have the artifacts from the current official master branch? I can create a PR on our official repo, that contains the commits of both ballots if that automatically creates new artifacts. Then, I can use MS word to compare the display the changes, thus creating a redline.<br><br>Would this work?<br><br><o:p></o:p></p><div><p>DZ. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p>Jul 17, 2020 18:32:10 Jos Purvis (jopurvis) <<a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com" target="_blank">jopurvis@cisco.com</a>>:<o:p></o:p></p><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-family:"Georgia",serif'>Hmmm. So I know we’ve never produced uploaded artifacts from PRs <i>from other people’s forks</i>, which makes sense—I thought that was the discussion. We’ve been producing artifacts from PRs of branches actually on the cabforum repo, though, because a quick peruse of the S3 bucket contents shows a folder for each cabforum/documents branch up through pandoc-travis-changes. </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-family:"Georgia",serif'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black'>-- <br>Jos Purvis (</span><a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com" target="_blank"><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Consolas;color:#954F72'>jopurvis@cisco.com</span></a><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Consolas;color:black'>)<br>.:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services<br>PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | Controls and Trust Verification</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-family:"Georgia",serif'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-family:"Georgia",serif'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><b><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>From: </span></b><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>Ryan Sleevi <<a href="mailto:sleevi@google.com" target="_blank">sleevi@google.com</a>><br><b>Date: </b>Friday, July 17, 2020 at 11:07 AM<br><b>To: </b>"Jos Purvis (jopurvis)" <<a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com" target="_blank">jopurvis@cisco.com</a>><br><b>Cc: </b>"Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)" <<a href="mailto:dzacharo@harica.gr" target="_blank">dzacharo@harica.gr</a>>, "<a href="mailto:infrastructure@cabforum.org" target="_blank">infrastructure@cabforum.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:infrastructure@cabforum.org" target="_blank">infrastructure@cabforum.org</a>><br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [Infrastructure] Preparation of review period for SC30 and SC31 </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:50 AM Jos Purvis (jopurvis) <<a href="mailto:jopurvis@cisco.com" target="_blank">jopurvis@cisco.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Hi Dimitris,<br><br>For the current version in Word format, you can fetch it from this link:<br> <a href="https://cabforum-travis-artifacts.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/builds/master/BR.docx" target="_blank">https://cabforum-travis-artifacts.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/builds/master/BR.docx</a><br><br>That's the same link as the PDF from the front page of the CABF repository, but with the extension changed to docx (we need to update the README on the repository to reflect the new formats and whatnot!).<br><br>For the SC30 and SC31 ballots, the Travis build completed successfully, but it doesn't look like it uploaded the resulting artifacts to S3. Ryan, is that something we need to fix? (Looks like that used to be the default and isn't anymore?)<o:p></o:p></p></blockquote><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>I think there's some confusion. It was never the default to upload artifacts for PRs. This is the whole discussion about the need to create a dedicated branch within the main CABF repository, then create a PR using that, to have the artifact produced. I'll see about doing that later today. <o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></div></body></html>