<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><b>Here are the final minutes of the subject meeting:<o:p></o:p></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Attendees:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Andrea Holland <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Atsushi Inaba <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Bruce Morton <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Corey Bonnell <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Dean Coclin <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Janet Hines <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Mike Reilly <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Roberto Quiñones<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Tim Crawford <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Tim Hollebeek<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Minute-taker: Corey<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Bruce read the anti-trust statement.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Minutes from July 29th were approved.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Ballot status was discussed:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>- Bruce said CSC-9 has passed and IPR review was sent.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>- Bruce reported that CSC-10 is in the voting period. Voting period will end at 2 PM EDT today. There are currently enough votes to meet quorum. Dean asked how long the IPR review period is for CSC-10. The group agreed it is 30 days.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Tim H. asked on the mailing list on whether Microsoft uses email addresses in Code Signing Certificates. Mike Reilly said that they will discuss internally and respond back.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>There was some discussion on whether the current requirements allow the addition of emailAddress subject RDN. Corey mentioned that it is currently not prohibited, as the requirements allow for any other subject attribute and the subjectAltName extension requirements are currently "no stipulation". Tim H. said that DigiCert would be supportive of writing a ballot to explicitly allow it.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The next topic was Pandocification of the CSBRs. Corey said there was recent progress that will be shared with the group before the next meeting.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>There was a discussion on remaining open items. One topic is how to integrate changes from the TLS BRs into the CSBRs. Mike mentioned that it would be good to have a recurring item to look at TLS BR changes and see if they are applicable to the CSBRs and whether updates are required.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Bruce said that beyond certificate content, it would be good to investigate changes to CA operational requirements in the TLS BRs and check applicability to CSBRs.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>It was agreed that the group will look at ballots that have passed recently and add agenda items to discuss applicability.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Dean mentioned that a member of TrustCor requested joining the group.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Bruce asked if there was any other business. Dean said that Ian will likely be back for the next meeting; Mike confirmed that is likely the case.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>There was no other business; meeting adjourned.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>