<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 22/7/2021 7:11 μ.μ., Tim Hollebeek
      via Cscwg-public wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:0100017acefcdff2-872bba92-3081-47eb-80f0-536bed8220b1-000000@email.amazonses.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
        medium)">
      <style>@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-compose;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext;}.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}</style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">I’m hearing from our code signing
          validation people that 11.1.1, which refers to non-EV CS
          certificates, has a requirement for additional validation for
          companies less than three years old (we’ve discussed this
          recently), but this requirement is missing for EV code signing
          certificates.<o:p></o:p></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">Is that what we want?  It seems very odd
          that a higher level of validation has fewer requirements.</p>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Hi Tim,<br>
    <br>
    For EV CS certificates there is a direct reference to the EV
    Guidelines. Specifically, 11.2.7 of the CSBRs point to EVG 11.6.<br>
    <br>
    EVG 11.6.2 includes language for companies less than three years
    old. I recall bringing this up in one of the previous calls where it
    was pointed out that it's not necessary for a company to be less
    than 3 years old if the other verification methods described in
    11.6.2 are used.<br>
    <br>
    Hope this helps.<br>
    <br>
    Dimitris.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:0100017acefcdff2-872bba92-3081-47eb-80f0-536bed8220b1-000000@email.amazonses.com">
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1D1C1D;background:#F8F8F8">-Tim</span><o:p></o:p></p>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Cscwg-public mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Cscwg-public@cabforum.org">Cscwg-public@cabforum.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/cscwg-public">https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/cscwg-public</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>