<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text Char";
margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.PlainTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Plain Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text";
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Final Minutes for May 6, 2021 CSCWG meeting<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Attendees:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>- Andrea Holland<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>- Atsushi Inaba<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>- Bruce Morton<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>- Chris Kemmerer<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>- Corey Bonnell<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>- Dean Coclin<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=ES>- Dimitris Zacharopoulos<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=ES>- Ian McMillan<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=ES>- Inigo Barreira<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText>- Janet Hines<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>- Mike Reilly<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>- Sebastian Schulz<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>- Tim Crawford<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Minute-taker: Tim Crawford<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Antitrust statement was read by Dean.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Minutes for April 22nd meeting were approved.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><b>Certificate policy OID for time stamping</b>: Mike Reilly and Microsoft agree with adding the policy OID to the CSBRs. CSWG understands concerns brought<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>by the Forum, but feels this is the best way to indicate a dedicated hierarchy. CSWG is moving forward and will explain this concept on Forum call next week.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><b>Clean-up ballot</b>:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Bruce should have a ballot for comments next week, not ready for a vote yet, will be sent to distribution list.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><b>BR SSL version numbers in CSBR</b>:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Current requirements are pinned to certain version number. We not we are not getting the benefits of updates to the BRs. Discussions included if this should be considered with an update to RFC 3647 format. Items that have been determined to benefit, such as log retention requirements will be included in the clean-up ballot. The remaining log retention issue needs to be completed by the Network Security Group to remove the conflict in retention requirements for validation requirement logs.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><b>Signing Service</b>:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Should we have a subcommittee to clarify requirements? CSWG determined we will invite other participants to another group. This invitation will be distributed through current DL and Forum DLs. Dean has the action to send<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>the invite.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><b>Application from Comsign</b>:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Comsign is not issuing CS certs, but plans to, Dean proposed admitting as an Associate Member. The question was raised if Associate Member is the right<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>status and it was determined to be acceptable. A consensus vote to accept Comsign as an Associate Member was held and approved. Dean will reach out to Comsign to inform.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>Meeting adjourned.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>