[Cscwg-public] Importing BRs to CSBRs
Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)
dzacharo at harica.gr
Thu Jul 13 08:52:12 UTC 2023
On 11/7/2023 6:34 μ.μ., Tim Hollebeek wrote:
>
> Thanks for all this work. I dropped a nit or two into a review, but
> would be happy to endorse.
>
Thanks Tim. Both have been addressed (I hope). I'll wait a couple more
days for any additional feedback and will kick off the discussion period
on Monday. I also updated the page on the wiki.
Best regards,
Dimitris.
> -Tim
>
> *From:*Cscwg-public <cscwg-public-bounces at cabforum.org> *On Behalf Of
> *Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Cscwg-public
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 11, 2023 5:22 AM
> *To:* cscwg-public at cabforum.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Cscwg-public] Importing BRs to CSBRs
>
> Dear Members,
>
> With CSBR version 3.3 released, we can proceed with the ballot to
> import the TLS BRs into the CSBRs. The draft ballot language is
> available on the wiki
> <https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/wiki.cabforum.org/books/code-signing-certificate-wg/page/csc-19-draft-remove-ssl-br-references___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoxMTViMWE5ZGYzNWQ5ZDQ4ODgxZmNhYjNlMDM2MzU4NTo2OjU0OTM6ZTUxNzMzOWE1ZTE0NDdhMDJmYWIzMjRmODBlNmRmYzM3YmM1NmJlYjU0NjRhY2U1Yjg4MDBiMTAzYWE1MmRhNjpoOkY>
> and I am still looking for one more endorser.
>
> You can check out the redline following this link:
>
> * https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/pull/16/files#diff-808316a5bc581afeb9178b30e20a9ab01f7d62f9
> <https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/github.com/cabforum/code-signing/pull/16/files%23diff-808316a5bc581afeb9178b30e20a9ab01f7d62f9___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoxMTViMWE5ZGYzNWQ5ZDQ4ODgxZmNhYjNlMDM2MzU4NTo2OjhjMTY6ZjBlMGNjYmY0OGI1NzZlMWQwZTNiYjQ1OGM2YTVlMjEzODBjNmM1NzI2N2EyMzNjOTc5YzYwMDZjOWIwOGJjMDpoOkY>
>
>
> If you prefer to send comments directly to the pull request, please
> use https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/pull/16
> <https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/github.com/cabforum/code-signing/pull/16___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoxMTViMWE5ZGYzNWQ5ZDQ4ODgxZmNhYjNlMDM2MzU4NTo2OjMwOTM6ZDEyZTQ4ZGJjNWE3NGUyMjYxYmU2YmZhODViNDFjNGQyYjM2NGUxYjJhNzA2YTg2NTY0OTEzMmUyNzU1M2Y2ZTpoOkY>.
>
>
> Thank you,
> Dimitris.
>
> On 5/4/2023 12:42 μ.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) wrote:
>
> Dear Members,
>
> I made some further edits to the imported requirements from the
> TLS BRs. We can discuss tomorrow at the meeting and if there is
> agreement we can remove the editorial notes. Please review using
> the Pull Request link
> <https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/github.com/cabforum/code-signing/pull/16/files___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoxMTViMWE5ZGYzNWQ5ZDQ4ODgxZmNhYjNlMDM2MzU4NTo2OmFlOWI6ODg1MGI3MmMwMDIyZGU4NTIxZDRhZjFjMGE1MWI3ZmQzNzVhM2E5Mzg4NTk1OTg4MjU1ZjJiMjQ4MDQ2M2VhNDpoOkY>.
>
> There is a task that needs to be performed throughout the entire
> document, and that is to scan for capitalized terms and
> check/confirm that these terms exist in section 1.6.1
> (Definitions). If they do not exist, we must highlight them and
> then decide whether the term is ok to remain without capitalized
> letters or if we have to create a definition for them.
>
> Is there anyone that would like to volunteer to work on this
> specific task?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Dimitris.
>
>
> On 15/12/2022 7:34 μ.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) wrote:
>
> Martijn,
>
> As we discussed on today's call, we can start reviewing the
> EDITOR comments at the upcoming meetings until we address all
> of them.
>
> Of course Members can comment in parallel on GitHub.
>
> For convenience, I created a Pull Request
> <https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/github.com/cabforum/code-signing/pull/16___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoxMTViMWE5ZGYzNWQ5ZDQ4ODgxZmNhYjNlMDM2MzU4NTo2OmFmYWM6NmQzODJjYTEwNTJlYTNjYjdmOWM5MmVlZTBhNDQxMTVmMWRkZTkzODk3MzZiNzU3NGRmMzNiOGVlYjUyZTQwZDpoOkY>
> for people to review more easily against the current CSBRs.
>
> Thanks,
> Dimitris.
>
> On 12/8/2022 2:40 PM, Martijn Katerbarg wrote:
>
> I’ve continued from the point where Dimitris left off.
> I’ve also given it another pass and updated a few more
> sections. Every update has an editor note added to it, and
> is now available in GitHub.
>
> The one section remaining to be done, is section
> 7.1.4.2.3. This section references BR Section 3.2 a
> number of times, so we appear to need to do a complete
> comparison of CSCBR Section 3.2 and BR Section 3.2, and
> import anything that’s “missing but relevant”.
>
> I’ve also discovered 2 potential conflicts, which are
> called out in the text. I’ll add github comments on these
> so we they become more visible to everyone, and people can
> chime in on the items easily.
>
> Regards,
>
> Martijn
>
> *From:*Cscwg-public <cscwg-public-bounces at cabforum.org>
> <mailto:cscwg-public-bounces at cabforum.org> *On Behalf Of
> *Martijn Katerbarg via Cscwg-public
> *Sent:* Monday, 5 December 2022 11:02
> *To:* Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) <dzacharo at harica.gr>
> <mailto:dzacharo at harica.gr>; cscwg-public at cabforum.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Cscwg-public] Importing BRs to CSBRs
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the
> organization. Do not click links or open attachments
> unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
> Dimitris, I’ll allot time this week to proceed from 7.1.4
>
> *From:*Cscwg-public <cscwg-public-bounces at cabforum.org>
> *On Behalf Of *Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via
> Cscwg-public
> *Sent:* Monday, 5 December 2022 10:34
> *To:* cscwg-public at cabforum.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Cscwg-public] Importing BRs to CSBRs
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the
> organization. Do not click links or open attachments
> unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
> I continued to work in this project and imported
> requirements all the way to section 7.1.4 (without working
> on 7.1.4) and would appreciate it if someone could pick up
> from there. The remaining references to a "BR Section" are
> very few but at the same time the editor must check every
> BR section that was not explicitly referenced by the CSBRs
> and import that language.
>
> Please check for additional comments/concerns that need to
> be addressed, marked with the word "EDITOR".
>
>
> Thanks,
> Dimitris.
>
> On 30/10/2022 1:21 μ.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)
> via Cscwg-public wrote:
>
>
> Dear friends,
>
> With the publication of CSBRs version 3.2, I created a
> branch and started importing TLS BRs (already
> completed sections 1 and 2). You can monitor the
> progress in:
>
> 1. https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/blob/importTLSBRrefs/docs/CSBR.md___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoxMTViMWE5ZGYzNWQ5ZDQ4ODgxZmNhYjNlMDM2MzU4NTo2Ojg3MzI6MDNlNjIwN2M2ZmUwOGE3ZTUwMzM4MDlkNGVjZThmNDAzYTlkMDc5YWRmMDhlYTI2ZTUzZGFjYzIwMTE3YmUyYTp0OkY
> <https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/github.com/cabforum/code-signing/blob/importTLSBRrefs/docs/CSBR.md___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoxMTViMWE5ZGYzNWQ5ZDQ4ODgxZmNhYjNlMDM2MzU4NTo2OjkyNjI6N2Q4NTQ4ZmFjMzUzMjk4ZDJhMzI1MDYyM2NlMWFlYjRjZTFiODc4Zjc4NzQyNjUxZmFjMzYwMDA0MGI3MTJlNDpoOkY>
>
> Since we will make a full pass of the TLS BRs and
> EVGs, I believe it is a good opportunity to import the
> requirements from*the latest TLS BRs/EVGs*
> (1.8.4/1.7.9 respectively). If we encounter some
> controversial requirements between the latest versions
> and the ones currently referenced that need more
> discussion, we will bring this back to the WG to
> discuss/resolve.
>
> Digicert (Corey) and Sectigo (Martijn) have already
> declared their intent to assist in this process. If
> there are more volunteers, please reply to this thread
> so we can possibly break-down the sections.
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dimitris.
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Cscwg-public mailing list
>
> Cscwg-public at cabforum.org
>
> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/cscwg-public <https://url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/cscwg-public___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzoxMTViMWE5ZGYzNWQ5ZDQ4ODgxZmNhYjNlMDM2MzU4NTo2OjdiNDU6ZGFkYWVhNGNmMTljZGU0MTY3MDI2YzQ5MGIzZmEzMjI0MDVmNmZhMWM2NjMwOGEwNjQ2ZWE0OGY2YTAzOWE3NTpoOkY>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/attachments/20230713/f33f07e1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Cscwg-public
mailing list